• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

site logo
The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language
search
  • Home
  • About TESL-EJ
  • Vols. 1-15 (1994-2012)
    • Volume 1
      • Volume 1, Number 1
      • Volume 1, Number 2
      • Volume 1, Number 3
      • Volume 1, Number 4
    • Volume 2
      • Volume 2, Number 1 — March 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 2 — September 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 3 — January 1997
      • Volume 2, Number 4 — June 1997
    • Volume 3
      • Volume 3, Number 1 — November 1997
      • Volume 3, Number 2 — March 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 3 — September 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 4 — January 1999
    • Volume 4
      • Volume 4, Number 1 — July 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 2 — November 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 3 — May 2000
      • Volume 4, Number 4 — December 2000
    • Volume 5
      • Volume 5, Number 1 — April 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 2 — September 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 3 — December 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 4 — March 2002
    • Volume 6
      • Volume 6, Number 1 — June 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 2 — September 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 3 — December 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 4 — March 2003
    • Volume 7
      • Volume 7, Number 1 — June 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 2 — September 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 3 — December 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 4 — March 2004
    • Volume 8
      • Volume 8, Number 1 — June 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 2 — September 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 3 — December 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 4 — March 2005
    • Volume 9
      • Volume 9, Number 1 — June 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 2 — September 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 3 — December 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 4 — March 2006
    • Volume 10
      • Volume 10, Number 1 — June 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 2 — September 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 3 — December 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 4 — March 2007
    • Volume 11
      • Volume 11, Number 1 — June 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 2 — September 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 3 — December 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 4 — March 2008
    • Volume 12
      • Volume 12, Number 1 — June 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 2 — September 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 3 — December 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 4 — March 2009
    • Volume 13
      • Volume 13, Number 1 — June 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 2 — September 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 3 — December 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 4 — March 2010
    • Volume 14
      • Volume 14, Number 1 — June 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 2 – September 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 3 – December 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 4 – March 2011
    • Volume 15
      • Volume 15, Number 1 — June 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 2 — September 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 3 — December 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 4 — March 2012
  • Vols. 16-Current
    • Volume 16
      • Volume 16, Number 1 — June 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 2 — September 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 3 — December 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 4 – March 2013
    • Volume 17
      • Volume 17, Number 1 – May 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 2 – August 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 3 – November 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 4 – February 2014
    • Volume 18
      • Volume 18, Number 1 – May 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 2 – August 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 3 – November 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 4 – February 2015
    • Volume 19
      • Volume 19, Number 1 – May 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 2 – August 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 3 – November 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 4 – February 2016
    • Volume 20
      • Volume 20, Number 1 – May 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 2 – August 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 3 – November 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 4 – February 2017
    • Volume 21
      • Volume 21, Number 1 – May 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 2 – August 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 3 – November 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 4 – February 2018
    • Volume 22
      • Volume 22, Number 1 – May 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 2 – August 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 3 – November 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 4 – February 2019
    • Volume 23
      • Volume 23, Number 1 – May 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 2 – August 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 3 – November 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 4 – February 2020
    • Volume 24
      • Volume 24, Number 1 – May 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 2 – August 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 3 – November 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 4 – February 2021
    • Volume 25
      • Volume 25, Number 1 – May 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 2 – August 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 3 – November 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 4 – February 2022
    • Volume 26
      • Volume 26, Number 1 – May 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 2 – August 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 3 – November 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 4 – February 2023
    • Volume 27
      • Volume 27, Number 1 – May 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 2 – August 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 3 – November 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 4 – February 2024
    • Volume 28
      • Volume 28, Number 1 – May 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 2 – August 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 3 – November 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 4 – February 2025
    • Volume 29
      • Volume 29, Number 1 – May 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 2 – August 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 3 – November 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 4 – February 2026
    • Volume 30
      • Volume 30, Number 1 – May 2026
      • Volume 30, Number 2 – August 2026
  • Books
  • How to Submit
    • Submission Info
    • Ethical Standards for Authors and Reviewers
    • TESL-EJ Style Sheet for Authors
    • TESL-EJ Tips for Authors
    • Book Review Policy
    • Media Review Policy
    • TESL-EJ Special issues
    • APA Style Guide
  • Editorial Board
  • Support

Issues in English

December 2000 — Volume 4, Number 4

Issues in English

Protea Textware, 1996
PO Box 49
Huntsbridge Victoria 3099
AUSTRALIA
Phone: 61.3.9714.8660; Fax: 61.3.9714.8644
E-mail: protea@mpx.com.au
Website: http://www.proteatextware.com.au/

Site Licences:

  1. single user license (may be used on one computer at a time)
      Australian$160 (approx US$95)
  2. 5 user license (may be used on up to 5 computers at a time, on one physical site)
     Australian$320 (approx US$190)
  3. 10 user license (may be used on up to 10 computers at a time, on one physical site)
     Australian$480 (approx US$285)
  4. site license (may be used on more than 10 computers at a time, on one physical site)
     Australian$640 (approx US$380)

System Requirements (IBM compatible only):

  • 256 color display
  • minimum 486-66 MHz processor, 8 MB RAM
  • Microsoft MS-DOS 3.1 or higher
  • Microsoft Windows 3.1 or higher
  • Windows compatible mouse or other pointing device
  • minimum double speed CD-ROM drive
  • sound card with speakers or headphones
  • 18 MB hard disk space
  • microphone

Introduction

Protea Textware’s Issues in English is an “interactive CD-ROM for teaching and testing English language skills in the areas of listening, reading, writing, grammar, vocabulary, and pronunciation,” and it presents these skills in eight different contexts or issues: Growing Old, Animal Rights, Discrimination, Gambling, Public Transportation, The Environment, Smoking, and Euthanasia. The program is designed for independent language learners who are either learning English at home or at an independent learning center.

Overview

The start-up screen for Issues in English has on it eight small pictures that represent each of the contexts, as well as icons that represent Help, Exit, Print, Level, and Teaching Points (which contain information about the range of skills covered at each level of the program). It is on this screen that the user picks the skill level she wants to practice. There are four skill levels for each issue, and all of the exercises in the program are based on one of 32 video clips (one per skill level, per issue) in which a person discusses her opinion or presents some basic information relating to the issue. As the mouse passes over the pictures, the name of the issue appears and is spoken. Clicking on a picture takes the user to the appropriate video clip for the chosen issue and skill level, and, after listening to the clip, the user then chooses on the language skill she wants to practice. The exercises are all similar in format no matter what the issue or skill level, and they are presented in two modes: the Learn Mode and the Test Mode. In the Learn Mode, the user is corrected immediately. In the Test Mode, users are not corrected, but they are given their scores at the end of the exercise. In the Learn Mode, when the user gets the correct answer, a voice says, “Good,” or “Excellent work,” or “That’s right,” and when the user misses a question, a voice says, “No” immediately. The exercises are quite varied in format–there is everything from fill-in-the-blank exercises to click-and-drag multiple choice exercises to summary writing exercises. Because it would be impossible for the program to grade or correct some of the exercises (mainly the writing exercises), they have to be graded by a teacher or peer.

One particularly helpful feature of the program is that worksheets for each of the exercises can be printed out so that language learners may practice their skills away from the computer. With some of the exercises, the worksheets are generated randomly so that they’re never the same when printed out. Another nice feature of the program is that a user’s scores from the Test Mode exercises can be printed out so that the user’s progress can be monitored.

Although there is written and spoken help available “at all times” and a user’s manual, using the program and completing the exercises is still confusing at times, particularly for a first-time user. The icons are not marked and often the user has to click on an icon in order to discover the action it represents. The manual does describe the purpose of each icon, but this wouldn’t be terribly helpful for the language learner who has limited skills in reading English.

One other rather annoying aspect of the program is that, in the exercises that require a typed, written response, it is very picky as to what it will accept, even in instances where there could easily be more than one correct answer. Such pickiness could easily confuse a language learner, and it could also discourage experimentation with sentence structure and word choice, which could be detrimental to the language learner’s progress in the long run. Similarly, the pictures used in some of the Listening exercises are confusing. For example, in one instance, the user is asked to choose the picture in which someone looks upset. There are, in fact, two pictures in which someone looks upset, and the correct answer depends on one’s understanding of the word upset–it could mean angry or it could mean sad. This is just one example of several in the Listening exercises that are confusing in the same way. One last minor problem with the program is that it has no minimizing button, so it’s basically impossible for one to multitask while using it, which is inconvenient for a user who might want to use it in conjunction with a word processing program.

Although it cannot be considered a problem, the software is Australian in origin; thus, the user should remember that some of the words or phrases used in the program differ in meaning from the same words or phrases found in American or British English.

Conclusion

Generally speaking, Issues in English would be quite helpful to the language learner who wanted to hone various English skills independently. Although a bit confusing in some aspects, the exercises provide useful and extensive practice in all of the six language skills.

Melissa S. Carr
Murray State University, Murray, Kentucky, USA
<melissa.carr@murraystate.edu>

Table of Contents Top TESL-EJ Main Page
© Copyright rests with authors. Please cite TESL-EJ appropriately.

Editor’s Note: Dashed numbers in square brackets indicate the end of each page for purposes of citation.

© 1994–2026 TESL-EJ, ISSN 1072-4303
Copyright of articles rests with the authors.