• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

site logo
The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language
search
  • Home
  • About TESL-EJ
  • Vols. 1-15 (1994-2012)
    • Volume 1
      • Volume 1, Number 1
      • Volume 1, Number 2
      • Volume 1, Number 3
      • Volume 1, Number 4
    • Volume 2
      • Volume 2, Number 1 — March 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 2 — September 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 3 — January 1997
      • Volume 2, Number 4 — June 1997
    • Volume 3
      • Volume 3, Number 1 — November 1997
      • Volume 3, Number 2 — March 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 3 — September 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 4 — January 1999
    • Volume 4
      • Volume 4, Number 1 — July 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 2 — November 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 3 — May 2000
      • Volume 4, Number 4 — December 2000
    • Volume 5
      • Volume 5, Number 1 — April 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 2 — September 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 3 — December 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 4 — March 2002
    • Volume 6
      • Volume 6, Number 1 — June 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 2 — September 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 3 — December 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 4 — March 2003
    • Volume 7
      • Volume 7, Number 1 — June 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 2 — September 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 3 — December 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 4 — March 2004
    • Volume 8
      • Volume 8, Number 1 — June 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 2 — September 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 3 — December 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 4 — March 2005
    • Volume 9
      • Volume 9, Number 1 — June 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 2 — September 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 3 — December 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 4 — March 2006
    • Volume 10
      • Volume 10, Number 1 — June 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 2 — September 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 3 — December 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 4 — March 2007
    • Volume 11
      • Volume 11, Number 1 — June 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 2 — September 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 3 — December 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 4 — March 2008
    • Volume 12
      • Volume 12, Number 1 — June 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 2 — September 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 3 — December 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 4 — March 2009
    • Volume 13
      • Volume 13, Number 1 — June 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 2 — September 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 3 — December 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 4 — March 2010
    • Volume 14
      • Volume 14, Number 1 — June 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 2 – September 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 3 – December 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 4 – March 2011
    • Volume 15
      • Volume 15, Number 1 — June 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 2 — September 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 3 — December 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 4 — March 2012
  • Vols. 16-Current
    • Volume 16
      • Volume 16, Number 1 — June 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 2 — September 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 3 — December 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 4 – March 2013
    • Volume 17
      • Volume 17, Number 1 – May 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 2 – August 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 3 – November 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 4 – February 2014
    • Volume 18
      • Volume 18, Number 1 – May 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 2 – August 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 3 – November 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 4 – February 2015
    • Volume 19
      • Volume 19, Number 1 – May 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 2 – August 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 3 – November 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 4 – February 2016
    • Volume 20
      • Volume 20, Number 1 – May 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 2 – August 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 3 – November 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 4 – February 2017
    • Volume 21
      • Volume 21, Number 1 – May 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 2 – August 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 3 – November 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 4 – February 2018
    • Volume 22
      • Volume 22, Number 1 – May 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 2 – August 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 3 – November 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 4 – February 2019
    • Volume 23
      • Volume 23, Number 1 – May 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 2 – August 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 3 – November 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 4 – February 2020
    • Volume 24
      • Volume 24, Number 1 – May 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 2 – August 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 3 – November 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 4 – February 2021
    • Volume 25
      • Volume 25, Number 1 – May 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 2 – August 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 3 – November 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 4 – February 2022
    • Volume 26
      • Volume 26, Number 1 – May 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 2 – August 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 3 – November 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 4 – February 2023
    • Volume 27
      • Volume 27, Number 1 – May 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 2 – August 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 3 – November 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 4 – February 2024
    • Volume 28
      • Volume 28, Number 1 – May 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 2 – August 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 3 – November 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 4 – February 2025
    • Volume 29
      • Volume 29, Number 1 – May 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 2 – August 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 3 – November 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 4 – February 2026
    • Volume 30
      • Volume 30, Number 1 – May 2026
      • Volume 30, Number 2 – August 2026
  • Books
  • How to Submit
    • Submission Info
    • Ethical Standards for Authors and Reviewers
    • TESL-EJ Style Sheet for Authors
    • TESL-EJ Tips for Authors
    • Book Review Policy
    • Media Review Policy
    • TESL-EJ Special issues
    • APA Style Guide
  • Editorial Board
  • Support

Exchanging Lives: Middle School Writers On-line

January 1999 — Volume 3, Number 4

Exchanging Lives: Middle School Writers On-line

Scott Christian (1997)
Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English
Pp. x + 147
ISBN 0-8141-1643-4 (paper)
US $15.95 (members, $11.95)

In the summer of 1992 rural teachers from six states were invited to a workshop at the Bread Loaf School of English near Middlebury, Vermont. Their purpose was to establish an on-line rural teachers’ network where isolated teachers could share ideas and resources. Out of this workshop, the Anne Frank Conference was born, which connected six middle school English classrooms from around the United States, all reading Anne Frank: The Diary of a Young Girl. Through telecommunication, rural classrooms in Alaska, Vermont, Mississippi, and New Mexico were able to exchange more than just ideas, they exchanged lives.

Exchanging Lives is both a piece of qualitative research and a reflective essay by a classroom teacher. The main purpose of his research was to determine whether or not the writing that came out of the conference was different from that which he had previously seen in his classroom. Scott Christian is an insightful teacher who demonstrates the importance of teacher-conducted research. In analyzing the transcripts from three years of the Anne Frank Conference, Christian brings insightful interpretation of his students’ writing. Only he as the primary teacher can compare the growth of his students as writers before and after the conference. While he focuses on the students, their teachers, and their growth as people and as writers, there is the idea that this type of learning and growth would not be possible without the technology behind it. This is an excellent example of how technology can enrich an educational experience without taking the focus away from the purpose of the class. Christian emphasizes that none of the teachers involved in the conference was particularly knowledgeable about technology before becoming involved in the conference.

Exchanging Lives is divided into an introduction and eight chapters. In the introduction and first chapter, Christian introduces the book with a discussion of the difficulties in motivating students to become actively involved in their writing. It is rare that their writing reflects the enthusiasm which is so prevalent in other aspects of their lives. Often there is little investment on the part of the writer. Scott states that “Teaching literature and writing is about connecting: the exchanging, the examining, and the growing of lives, both on the page and in our classrooms” (p. 10). The most important thing to middle school students is their connection to their peers. In class, students most often are required to write to the teacher about topics that are [-1-] detached from their daily lives. The conference was a means of giving the students a genuine audience. During the conference, the students’ level of concern for their writing increased because they had a real purpose. The author also reflects on the importance of integrating technology into the classroom to enhance rather than take away from the focus of the class. The telecommunication used often became transparent to the students, meaning that they were not focused on the technology for its own sake but for the purpose of communicating their thoughts and ideas to others.

The second chapter is an overview of the development of the Anne Frank Conference. The first conference lasted about seven weeks. Each week a different class would post a prompt to which the other classes in the conference would respond. With each prompt from a classroom, students had to interpret the text, then connect their insights to their own lives. It is important to note that the on-line conference was only a part of the sequences that were taking place in each classroom. Individual teachers were teaching their students with their own particular styles. Partaking in the on-line discussion did not force the participating teachers into one model of teaching. Each class had its own approach to the diary of Anne Frank. Because each class had different learning experiences it could share its unique insights into the diary that another class might not have achieved.

In the next four chapters, Christian analyzes the transcripts from the three years of the conference and looks for growth in the writing of his students. In reviewing the data, the author focuses on what effect the writing has on the reader. The students’ writings are categorized into five types based upon the effect the writing has on its audience: a) performing writing seems disconnected from the reader; b) reaching writing reaches towards an audience; c) connecting writing connects with the audience; d) striving writing connects to the audience in an experimental, speculative, or thought-provoking manner; and e) talking writing becomes a dialog between writers. He gives rubrics for categorization, but admits that there are not clear-cut boundaries between categories. He supports his arguments with numerous examples of student writing from the conference. Striving writing is the kind of writing that teachers seek, where the students take risks, opening themselves to their audience. It gives a voice to the writer. Striving writing manifested itself more often in the Anne Frank Conference than it did before the conference.

While the categories of performing, reaching, connecting, and striving writing can be seen in a normal class, talking writing is a new form of writing that seems to have developed as a result of the conference, where two writers engage in a dialog. This is different from the writing that occurs in a class when students pass notes. When passing notes, the students know the audience intimately and have no hurdles to overcome. The talking writing of the conference [-2-] is between two people who have never met, who live in very different cultural and regional circumstances. Talking writing is very much like striving writing, where the writers take risks and have a high level of investment in their writing. It is open and sincere. The main difference between striving writing and talking writing is that it is addressed to a particular person as opposed to a group of readers.

The seventh and eighth chapters include discussions about how the conference introduced a level of diversity into the students’ lives that would not be possible without the telecommunications technology, and how this new literacy fits into the lives of teachers and students. Students from a mainly white community were able to discuss openly for the first time issues of prejudice with minority students from a racially diverse community as well as with students on an Indian reservation. Other students were able to share ideas that their own class might deride but students in other classes would write back and support their positions. For middle school students, that reaffirmation of their beliefs by their peers is essential to their growth as human beings.

Scott Christian’s style of writing is both personal and practical. Although the focus of the book is the students and their growth as writers throughout the Anne Frank Conference, it is also a good example of how technology fits into the classroom. The book does not require any computer expertise to understand it, and elements of the project outlined in this book could be modified to work at almost any level. Teachers of middle school and above will gain valuable insights into teaching writing and integrating technology in an interactive and meaningful setting.

Although this is not specifically an ESL book, there are many applications that can be drawn from Exchanging Lives. A telecommunications audience can give ESL students the impetus to communicate in English. In fact, if students live in a community where English is not used, it may be the only real opportunity they have to use their English to communicate with others.

James Audette
Krieger Schechter Day School, Baltimore, MD
<jamesaudet@aol.com>

© Copyright rests with authors. Please cite TESL-EJ appropriately.

Editor’s Note: Dashed numbers in square brackets indicate the end of each page in the paginated ASCII version of this article, which is the definitive edition. Please use these page numbers when citing this work.

[-3-]

© 1994–2026 TESL-EJ, ISSN 1072-4303
Copyright of articles rests with the authors.