• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

site logo
The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language
search
  • Home
  • About TESL-EJ
  • Vols. 1-15 (1994-2012)
    • Volume 1
      • Volume 1, Number 1
      • Volume 1, Number 2
      • Volume 1, Number 3
      • Volume 1, Number 4
    • Volume 2
      • Volume 2, Number 1 — March 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 2 — September 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 3 — January 1997
      • Volume 2, Number 4 — June 1997
    • Volume 3
      • Volume 3, Number 1 — November 1997
      • Volume 3, Number 2 — March 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 3 — September 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 4 — January 1999
    • Volume 4
      • Volume 4, Number 1 — July 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 2 — November 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 3 — May 2000
      • Volume 4, Number 4 — December 2000
    • Volume 5
      • Volume 5, Number 1 — April 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 2 — September 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 3 — December 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 4 — March 2002
    • Volume 6
      • Volume 6, Number 1 — June 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 2 — September 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 3 — December 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 4 — March 2003
    • Volume 7
      • Volume 7, Number 1 — June 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 2 — September 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 3 — December 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 4 — March 2004
    • Volume 8
      • Volume 8, Number 1 — June 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 2 — September 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 3 — December 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 4 — March 2005
    • Volume 9
      • Volume 9, Number 1 — June 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 2 — September 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 3 — December 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 4 — March 2006
    • Volume 10
      • Volume 10, Number 1 — June 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 2 — September 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 3 — December 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 4 — March 2007
    • Volume 11
      • Volume 11, Number 1 — June 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 2 — September 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 3 — December 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 4 — March 2008
    • Volume 12
      • Volume 12, Number 1 — June 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 2 — September 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 3 — December 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 4 — March 2009
    • Volume 13
      • Volume 13, Number 1 — June 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 2 — September 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 3 — December 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 4 — March 2010
    • Volume 14
      • Volume 14, Number 1 — June 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 2 – September 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 3 – December 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 4 – March 2011
    • Volume 15
      • Volume 15, Number 1 — June 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 2 — September 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 3 — December 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 4 — March 2012
  • Vols. 16-Current
    • Volume 16
      • Volume 16, Number 1 — June 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 2 — September 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 3 — December 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 4 – March 2013
    • Volume 17
      • Volume 17, Number 1 – May 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 2 – August 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 3 – November 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 4 – February 2014
    • Volume 18
      • Volume 18, Number 1 – May 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 2 – August 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 3 – November 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 4 – February 2015
    • Volume 19
      • Volume 19, Number 1 – May 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 2 – August 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 3 – November 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 4 – February 2016
    • Volume 20
      • Volume 20, Number 1 – May 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 2 – August 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 3 – November 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 4 – February 2017
    • Volume 21
      • Volume 21, Number 1 – May 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 2 – August 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 3 – November 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 4 – February 2018
    • Volume 22
      • Volume 22, Number 1 – May 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 2 – August 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 3 – November 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 4 – February 2019
    • Volume 23
      • Volume 23, Number 1 – May 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 2 – August 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 3 – November 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 4 – February 2020
    • Volume 24
      • Volume 24, Number 1 – May 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 2 – August 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 3 – November 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 4 – February 2021
    • Volume 25
      • Volume 25, Number 1 – May 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 2 – August 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 3 – November 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 4 – February 2022
    • Volume 26
      • Volume 26, Number 1 – May 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 2 – August 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 3 – November 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 4 – February 2023
    • Volume 27
      • Volume 27, Number 1 – May 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 2 – August 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 3 – November 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 4 – February 2024
    • Volume 28
      • Volume 28, Number 1 – May 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 2 – August 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 3 – November 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 4 – February 2025
    • Volume 29
      • Volume 29, Number 1 – May 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 2 – August 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 3 – November 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 4 – February 2026
    • Volume 30
      • Volume 30, Number 1 – May 2026
      • Volume 30, Number 2 – August 2026
  • Books
  • How to Submit
    • Submission Info
    • Ethical Standards for Authors and Reviewers
    • TESL-EJ Style Sheet for Authors
    • TESL-EJ Tips for Authors
    • Book Review Policy
    • Media Review Policy
    • TESL-EJ Special issues
    • APA Style Guide
  • Editorial Board
  • Support

Bilingual Education: From Compensatory to Quality Schooling

January 1999 — Volume 3, Number 4

Bilingual Education: From Compensatory to Quality Schooling

María Estela Brisk (1998)
Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
Pp. xx + 206
ISBN 0-8058-2495-2 (paper)
U.S. $29.95

This book should be required reading in all teacher training programs, from elementary through post-secondary. It gives a good overview of the needs of bilingual students in the U.S. and of what is being done to serve these needs. Brisk explains the background as well as the current issues in the debate over bilingual education, and in the process presents powerful evidence for bilingual education by describing effective programs. She emphasizes that ideological attitudes must be set aside in order to focus on the real issue: how can bilingual and bicultural students be given a quality education, not simply a compensatory one (p. xix).

The primary audience for this book is teachers in public elementary and high schools, judging from the extensive examples cited. However, teachers entering any educational setting with students from differing cultures (and what educational situation today does not have such students?) can benefit greatly from the information assembled and explained in this work. “All students,” she states, “not only bilinguals, need to find balance in their quest to become global, preserving their own individual identity as well” (p. 163). This is a tall order, but a necessary one in the United States, and this book illustrates how this goal can actually be accomplished.

Bilingual Education: From Compensatory to Quality Schooling has two persistent themes: bilingual education works, although no program can be universal, and bilingual education is necessary for students to get a quality education. Brisk hits her themes hard, from the Introduction, a useful primer in the debate over how to define terms such as “bilingual,” right through the six chapters. In chapter 1, “Bilingual Education Debate,” Brisk lays out the complexities of the debate and brings us to the bottom line: “Unfortunately, languages become entangled in political battles, dragging the education and the future of innocent children into such conflicts” (p. 5). This first chapter also gives a concise outline of different models, such as structured immersion and transitional bilingual education, pointing out the goals and practices of each. Brisk emphasizes that the debate needs to get away from a focus simply on language issues: “The question that needs to be asked is what conditions create successful learning environments for language minority students” (p. 32). [-1-]

The subsequent chapters deal with how to create these conditions for successful learning. In “External and Internal Influences on Bilingual Students’ Education,” Brisk discusses the social, cultural, economic, and multitude of other factors that affect students. Chapters 3, 4, and 5 present excellent points to consider in “Creating a Good School,” “Creating Quality Curricula,” and “Creating Quality Instruction.” Each of these chapters is full of ideas and observations, encouraging practicing teachers to examine their own situations in a new light and giving strong guidance for teachers in training. Some of the issues discussed are the importance of high expectations, the role of the native language in different classes, assessment, and integrating bilingual students with the larger school community. More ideas for teaching are found in the appendix, but the author is careful to point out the importance of context for effective activities and programs. For example, on the issue of whether to accept multiple language varieties or to restrict usage to one variety in class, she says, “Both points of view are acceptable, depending on the circumstances” (p. 131). This kind of responsiveness to the situation is a hallmark of successful programs.

The final chapter, “Beyond the Debate,” brings to a head the author’s frustration with the current debate over bilingual education, a debate mired in issues of national language. She argues that students are being considered secondarily, if at all, by politicians and often by educators themselves. “The rising sense of frustration with public education has called into question our ability to educate our students,” she writes (p. 163). To build effective schools, we need to see what works: “Overreliance on particular models [of bilingual education] often detracts from analysis of what actually happens in schools” (p. 160).

In her preface, Brisk speaks of how “the pieces of the educational puzzle” are out there, if schools have the will to pull them together despite ideological pressures (p. xii). Good bilingual programs do exist; there are effective practices, as proven by research and experience. This book can go a long way towards helping educators bring these pieces together so that schools can create the effective bilingual education that this country needs to flourish in the next century.

Robert Retherford
Cumberland County College, New Jersey
<rretherford@cccnj.net>

© Copyright rests with authors. Please cite TESL-EJ appropriately.

Editor’s Note: Dashed numbers in square brackets indicate the end of each page in the paginated ASCII version of this article, which is the definitive edition. Please use these page numbers when citing this work.

[-2-]

© 1994–2026 TESL-EJ, ISSN 1072-4303
Copyright of articles rests with the authors.