• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

site logo
The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language
search
  • Home
  • About TESL-EJ
  • Vols. 1-15 (1994-2012)
    • Volume 1
      • Volume 1, Number 1
      • Volume 1, Number 2
      • Volume 1, Number 3
      • Volume 1, Number 4
    • Volume 2
      • Volume 2, Number 1 — March 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 2 — September 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 3 — January 1997
      • Volume 2, Number 4 — June 1997
    • Volume 3
      • Volume 3, Number 1 — November 1997
      • Volume 3, Number 2 — March 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 3 — September 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 4 — January 1999
    • Volume 4
      • Volume 4, Number 1 — July 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 2 — November 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 3 — May 2000
      • Volume 4, Number 4 — December 2000
    • Volume 5
      • Volume 5, Number 1 — April 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 2 — September 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 3 — December 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 4 — March 2002
    • Volume 6
      • Volume 6, Number 1 — June 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 2 — September 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 3 — December 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 4 — March 2003
    • Volume 7
      • Volume 7, Number 1 — June 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 2 — September 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 3 — December 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 4 — March 2004
    • Volume 8
      • Volume 8, Number 1 — June 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 2 — September 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 3 — December 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 4 — March 2005
    • Volume 9
      • Volume 9, Number 1 — June 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 2 — September 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 3 — December 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 4 — March 2006
    • Volume 10
      • Volume 10, Number 1 — June 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 2 — September 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 3 — December 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 4 — March 2007
    • Volume 11
      • Volume 11, Number 1 — June 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 2 — September 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 3 — December 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 4 — March 2008
    • Volume 12
      • Volume 12, Number 1 — June 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 2 — September 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 3 — December 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 4 — March 2009
    • Volume 13
      • Volume 13, Number 1 — June 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 2 — September 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 3 — December 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 4 — March 2010
    • Volume 14
      • Volume 14, Number 1 — June 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 2 – September 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 3 – December 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 4 – March 2011
    • Volume 15
      • Volume 15, Number 1 — June 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 2 — September 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 3 — December 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 4 — March 2012
  • Vols. 16-Current
    • Volume 16
      • Volume 16, Number 1 — June 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 2 — September 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 3 — December 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 4 – March 2013
    • Volume 17
      • Volume 17, Number 1 – May 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 2 – August 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 3 – November 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 4 – February 2014
    • Volume 18
      • Volume 18, Number 1 – May 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 2 – August 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 3 – November 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 4 – February 2015
    • Volume 19
      • Volume 19, Number 1 – May 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 2 – August 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 3 – November 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 4 – February 2016
    • Volume 20
      • Volume 20, Number 1 – May 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 2 – August 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 3 – November 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 4 – February 2017
    • Volume 21
      • Volume 21, Number 1 – May 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 2 – August 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 3 – November 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 4 – February 2018
    • Volume 22
      • Volume 22, Number 1 – May 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 2 – August 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 3 – November 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 4 – February 2019
    • Volume 23
      • Volume 23, Number 1 – May 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 2 – August 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 3 – November 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 4 – February 2020
    • Volume 24
      • Volume 24, Number 1 – May 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 2 – August 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 3 – November 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 4 – February 2021
    • Volume 25
      • Volume 25, Number 1 – May 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 2 – August 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 3 – November 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 4 – February 2022
    • Volume 26
      • Volume 26, Number 1 – May 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 2 – August 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 3 – November 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 4 – February 2023
    • Volume 27
      • Volume 27, Number 1 – May 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 2 – August 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 3 – November 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 4 – February 2024
    • Volume 28
      • Volume 28, Number 1 – May 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 2 – August 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 3 – November 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 4 – February 2025
    • Volume 29
      • Volume 29, Number 1 – May 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 2 – August 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 3 – November 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 4 – February 2026
    • Volume 30
      • Volume 30, Number 1 – May 2026
      • Volume 30, Number 2 – August 2026
  • Books
  • How to Submit
    • Submission Info
    • Ethical Standards for Authors and Reviewers
    • TESL-EJ Style Sheet for Authors
    • TESL-EJ Tips for Authors
    • Book Review Policy
    • Media Review Policy
    • TESL-EJ Special issues
    • APA Style Guide
  • Editorial Board
  • Support

Academic Word Lists: What Every Teacher Needs to Know

May 2021 – Volume 25, Number 1

Academic Word Lists: What Every Teacher Needs to Know

Author: Keith S. Folse (2020) book cover
Publisher: Ann Arbor: U. of Michigan Press
Pages ISBN-13 Price
Pp. 97 978-0-472-12567-8 (ebook) $3.99 U.S.

Keith Folse’s (2020) eBook, Academic Word Lists: What Every Teacher Needs to Know, offers a comprehensive overview of the historical development of word lists for English language teaching, such as the ubiquitous Academic Word List (AWL; Coxhead, 2000). This book also sheds light on some common misconceptions about teaching vocabulary in second language (L2) classrooms. In addition to the recent research on the development and effectiveness of word lists in L2 learning, this work has a critical focus on both language teaching and language learning. According to Folse, the purpose of Academic Word Lists is two-fold: firstly, to expand teachers’ knowledge about useful academic vocabulary lists (such as the AWL); and secondly, to learn the most practical and effective ways for using these lists to facilitate and improve vocabulary learning. For too long, teachers have been told that word lists are useless or detrimental, a myth that Folse debunked with solid research findings in an earlier work (Folse, 2004). Teachers who believe that explicit vocabulary teaching is pointless, frustrating, or boring can certainly learn a lot from Academic Word Lists: What Every Teacher Needs to Know.

In the brief introductory section, Folse uses his own extensive language learning and teaching experiences to explain the many benefits of teaching and learning with word lists. As Folse explains, the inconsistencies and limitations of early word lists that teachers may have used is not a mark against word lists in general, and there are, in fact, many excellent corpus-based word lists for both general use and specific genres (e.g., business, law, and secondary school science). The introduction is followed by nine chapters that can be divided into three parts based on their focus.

Part I contains the first two chapters which emphasize the importance of knowing productive vocabulary teaching techniques for meeting students’ lexical needs. In Chapter 1 (“Why Are Word Lists Useful in Language Learning”), Folse explains why the Natural Approach (perceived to be commonly used) is not a truly viable option for teaching vocabulary, as it requires “lots of input and lots of time” (p. 14). The Natural Approach focuses on communication activities and tends to neglect aspects of formal instruction such as grammar, spelling, and vocabulary. It was an attempt to replicate what native speakers do in acquiring their first language in the L2 classroom. However, L2 acquisition is extremely complex and not the same as acquiring a first language. Therefore, students are in great need of explicit vocabulary instruction, which requires educators to put more effort into choosing appropriate word lists. Chapter 2 (“How Serious Is Our Students’ Lexical Gap”) introduces the idea of ESL students’ academic lexical gaps. Instead of relying heavily on randomly generated lists, L2 teachers should use corpus-based word lists that include frequent academic words and phrases to better prepare their students for academic success.

Within Part II, Chapter 3 (“A Timeline of the AWL”) provides a timeline of the AWL. First, Folse briefly describes word lists that existed prior to the development of the groundbreaking AWL. Next, he explains why researchers and educators began to seriously question the effectiveness of the Natural Approach and became advocates for “more grammar instruction and error correction” (p. 24). Finally, the timeline ends with the enormous growth in L2 vocabulary research that was sparked by the publication of the AWL in 2000. Chapter 4 (“Which Words Are on the AWL”) offers a thorough description of the AWL, including the number and type of words included in it (570-word families), and how the list is organized. The AWL words are presented in four ways, and teachers should use the option that fulfills their students’ English needs. These four ways include presenting words alphabetically by (1) headword, (2) headword with family members, (3) headword with family members and most frequent word italicized, and (4) only the most frequent member of each word family by sublists. Folse recommends the fourth option because learners may not always have sufficient time to study the whole word family, and focusing on the most frequent words can make learning more efficient. Chapter 5 (“How Were the 570 Word Families on the AWL Selected”) details the complicated process that Averil Coxhead (2000) went through to produce the AWL, including creating a corpus, operationalizing a “word,” and then deciding which words are academic.

Chapter 6 (“How Do Other Word Lists Differ from the AWL”) is of particular interest to teachers, because Folse describes how other corpus-based word lists differ from the AWL and reviews studies that compare the coverage of the AWL and the Academic Vocabulary List across multiple corpora. Folse’s main point is that, while the AWL is indeed a very good list and is important to the field, many other lists have been developed that include better coverage for students’ actual language needs.

Part III includes the last three chapters (Chapter 7-9), which introduce useful practices and suggestions for language learners and teachers regarding the use of the AWL, as well as the needs for future vocabulary research. Some tips from this section include using notebooks and teaching vocabulary learning strategies. L2 teachers must encourage their students to become “aggressive vocabulary hunters” (p. 62) by using notebooks and learning essential practices that keep them interacting with these notebooks. They should also start with a small corpus-based word list that matches students’ needs, and, most importantly, teach students vocabulary-learning strategies to alleviate the arduous task of learning so many new words.

Overall, the major strength of Academic Word Lists: What Every Teacher Needs to Know lies in its focus and presentation of a fundamental teaching tool for learning English vocabulary—a word list. Besides offering several available corpus-based word lists, the author provides clear, practical guidelines and strategies for language teachers and learners on how to gain ultimate benefits from using these academic word lists. Furthermore, the book is easy to read because of the author’s organization of topics and use of language that facilitates understanding of concepts. In addition, Folse describes recent vocabulary studies that compare the effects of using different word lists, which can provide a starting point for future research.

One oversight of Academic Word Lists is the lack of information about different types of vocabulary apps and their effects on vocabulary development; however, Folse does address this issue and guides readers to online resources (p. 74). Generally speaking, the book provides valuable options and strategies for teaching vocabulary in the EFL classroom. It is a useful and practical resource for English teachers and learners worldwide, one that I can recommend to fellow teachers interested in research-based teaching and learning strategies.

References

Coxhead, A. (2000). A new academic word list. TESOL Quarterly, 34(2), 213-238.

Folse, K. (2004). Vocabulary myths: Applying second language research to classroom teaching. University of Michigan Press.

Reviewed by
Abdulmajeed Alotaibi
University of Central Florida, USA
<abdulmajeedatmarkknights.ucf.edu>

© Copyright rests with authors. Please cite TESL-EJ appropriately.
Editor’s Note: The HTML version contains no page numbers. Please use the PDF version of this article for citations.

© 1994–2026 TESL-EJ, ISSN 1072-4303
Copyright of articles rests with the authors.