• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

site logo
The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language
search
  • Home
  • About TESL-EJ
  • Vols. 1-15 (1994-2012)
    • Volume 1
      • Volume 1, Number 1
      • Volume 1, Number 2
      • Volume 1, Number 3
      • Volume 1, Number 4
    • Volume 2
      • Volume 2, Number 1 — March 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 2 — September 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 3 — January 1997
      • Volume 2, Number 4 — June 1997
    • Volume 3
      • Volume 3, Number 1 — November 1997
      • Volume 3, Number 2 — March 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 3 — September 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 4 — January 1999
    • Volume 4
      • Volume 4, Number 1 — July 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 2 — November 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 3 — May 2000
      • Volume 4, Number 4 — December 2000
    • Volume 5
      • Volume 5, Number 1 — April 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 2 — September 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 3 — December 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 4 — March 2002
    • Volume 6
      • Volume 6, Number 1 — June 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 2 — September 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 3 — December 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 4 — March 2003
    • Volume 7
      • Volume 7, Number 1 — June 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 2 — September 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 3 — December 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 4 — March 2004
    • Volume 8
      • Volume 8, Number 1 — June 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 2 — September 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 3 — December 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 4 — March 2005
    • Volume 9
      • Volume 9, Number 1 — June 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 2 — September 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 3 — December 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 4 — March 2006
    • Volume 10
      • Volume 10, Number 1 — June 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 2 — September 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 3 — December 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 4 — March 2007
    • Volume 11
      • Volume 11, Number 1 — June 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 2 — September 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 3 — December 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 4 — March 2008
    • Volume 12
      • Volume 12, Number 1 — June 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 2 — September 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 3 — December 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 4 — March 2009
    • Volume 13
      • Volume 13, Number 1 — June 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 2 — September 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 3 — December 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 4 — March 2010
    • Volume 14
      • Volume 14, Number 1 — June 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 2 – September 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 3 – December 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 4 – March 2011
    • Volume 15
      • Volume 15, Number 1 — June 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 2 — September 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 3 — December 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 4 — March 2012
  • Vols. 16-Current
    • Volume 16
      • Volume 16, Number 1 — June 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 2 — September 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 3 — December 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 4 – March 2013
    • Volume 17
      • Volume 17, Number 1 – May 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 2 – August 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 3 – November 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 4 – February 2014
    • Volume 18
      • Volume 18, Number 1 – May 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 2 – August 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 3 – November 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 4 – February 2015
    • Volume 19
      • Volume 19, Number 1 – May 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 2 – August 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 3 – November 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 4 – February 2016
    • Volume 20
      • Volume 20, Number 1 – May 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 2 – August 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 3 – November 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 4 – February 2017
    • Volume 21
      • Volume 21, Number 1 – May 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 2 – August 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 3 – November 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 4 – February 2018
    • Volume 22
      • Volume 22, Number 1 – May 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 2 – August 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 3 – November 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 4 – February 2019
    • Volume 23
      • Volume 23, Number 1 – May 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 2 – August 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 3 – November 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 4 – February 2020
    • Volume 24
      • Volume 24, Number 1 – May 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 2 – August 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 3 – November 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 4 – February 2021
    • Volume 25
      • Volume 25, Number 1 – May 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 2 – August 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 3 – November 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 4 – February 2022
    • Volume 26
      • Volume 26, Number 1 – May 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 2 – August 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 3 – November 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 4 – February 2023
    • Volume 27
      • Volume 27, Number 1 – May 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 2 – August 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 3 – November 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 4 – February 2024
    • Volume 28
      • Volume 28, Number 1 – May 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 2 – August 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 3 – November 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 4 – February 2025
    • Volume 29
      • Volume 29, Number 1 – May 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 2 – August 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 3 – November 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 4 – February 2026
    • Volume 30
      • Volume 30, Number 1 – May 2026
      • Volume 30, Number 2 – August 2026
  • Books
  • How to Submit
    • Submission Info
    • Ethical Standards for Authors and Reviewers
    • TESL-EJ Style Sheet for Authors
    • TESL-EJ Tips for Authors
    • Book Review Policy
    • Media Review Policy
    • TESL-EJ Special issues
    • APA Style Guide
  • Editorial Board
  • Support

The Hopes and Experiences of Bilingual Teachers of English: Investments, Expectations, and Identity

November 2020 – Volume 24, Number 3

The Hopes and Experiences of Bilingual Teachers of English:
Investments, Expectations, and Identity

Author: Melinda Kong (2019) book cover
Publisher: New York: Routledge
Pages ISBN Price
Pp. 198 9780367484101 (paper) $47.95 U.S.

The globalization of the English language and increasing emphasis on internationalization in higher education has led to a rising demand for English medium education. In connection with this trend is an increase in the number of bilingual English teachers who choose to pursue degrees or further professional training in core anglosphere nations. Through empirical work presented in The Hopes and Experiences of Bilingual Teachers of English: Investments, Expectations, and Identity, Melinda Kong (2019) posits the importance of understanding the dynamic identities and lived experiences of eight Asian bilingual teachers of English from Brunei, China, Indonesia, Taiwan, and Vietnam. These participants took a brief pause from teaching English to further their teacher education in graduate programs in Australia. Kong suggests that these teachers’ individual hopes, expectations, and investments in seeking postgraduate training from an English-dominant country had a significant impact on their ever-evolving identity as English language teachers and users. The teaching constraints in each teacher’s home context predicted the way some participants taught upon repatriation.

While not officially divided into sections, Kong’s study seems to span three major topic areas: a) an introduction to the topic and rationale behind the study’s theoretical approaches (Chapters 1-3); b) a presentation of each individual participant’s story through personal interviews and correspondences (Chapter 4), and c) a conclusion that ties together strategic investments drawn from the eight participants’ individual experiences (Chapters 5-6).

The first chapter contains an introduction to Kong’s motivations for the study, as well as observations about the importance of research on language teachers. Kong undertook research into bilingual English teachers’ study abroad experiences and identity to shed light on successful language teacher preparation and development. An overview of current research on English teacher identities is provided in Chapter 2, highlighting the impact that teacher identity can have on language teaching. Pierce’s (1997) theory of investment, as well as Varghese et al.’s (2005) and Phan’s (2008) theory on language teacher identities are discussed. By referencing these theories, Kong demonstrates how her participants have multifaceted identities as bilingual English users, teachers, and graduate students abroad. In addition, she emphasizes the role that societal and power relations play on learners’ language investment and their identity in both English and their home language. In Chapter 3, Kong explains the source of her data, which is gathered from multiple interviews of each participant at various points of their sojourn in Australia, as well as a final interview four weeks after their repatriation. Here, Kong grounds the study in the theories from the previous chapter, making explicit the connections that she sees between the participants’ identity negotiations in Australia and their sociocultural identity and goals for their time abroad.

Chapter 4 provides detailed descriptions drawn from interview data of the eight participants’ personal histories, highlighting expectations prior to their time abroad and then the experiences that influenced their identities in Australia. Participants found different ways to work towards their language goals while abroad. One participant joined a church in order to socialize with local Australians, while another found work as a waitress at a local restaurant to experience local culture. Participants reported being treated with increased prestige in their home contexts as a result of obtaining a degree from Australia, though a few found it difficult to replicate teaching theories taught abroad due to differences in the home teaching environments.

Chapter 5 is a synthesis of common themes that emerged from participant interviews and correspondences. These included the creative, agentive ways participants invested in English learning outside of classes, and the way their experiences in Australia shaped their language learner/teacher identities. For example, although all participants sought to improve their English in Australia, there were times when they found it much easier to use their native language. In the final chapter, Kong stresses that, while it is important to understand how studying abroad impacts the identity of international English teachers, it is equally important to recognize their out-of-class language experiences. One way Kong does this is by referencing Peirce’s (1995) investment theory to indicate the importance of context in language investment. Despite a high investment in learning English, participants were also invested in their own sociocultural identities. They wished to develop a sense of belonging with those who shared similar backgrounds, and often did this by socializing in their home language. Thus, depending on circumstances, their desire to practice English or to reinforce their sociocultural identity may have directed which language they used.

Kong’s review is valuable to those interested in language teacher identity research. A merit of Kong’s work is how she presents equitable ways of discussing her participants’ lived experiences. Rather than defaulting to binary terminology, such as native or non-native teachers of English that have been increasingly problematized in SLA research (Ortega, 2013), the author consistently uses bilingual teachers of English, representing their experiences as legitimate, well-trained English teachers with multifaceted identities.

However, those hoping to gain an understanding of the impact of study abroad experiences on all bilingual teachers should be aware that Kong’s research is very much grounded in the experiences of bilingual teachers of English from select Asian contexts. The conclusions drawn from their experiences in Australia and the impact their study abroad had on their teaching upon their return to Asia might not apply in non-Asian contexts. Though the study reveals much useful information, many may find its scope limited by its sole focus on Asian participants.

Overall, The Hopes and Experiences of Bilingual Teachers of English will be beneficial to bilingual teachers of English who wonder how pedagogies taught abroad may be beneficial to Asian contexts or who are considering professional training abroad. Similarly, TESOL program educators may find this book useful for a more nuanced perspective on their international students’ experiences outside the classroom, as well as how to better adapt courses to meet student needs. Finally, researchers interested in English language teacher identities should find this work enlightening due to its fresh perspective on the lived experiences of bilingual English teacher experiences outside the classroom.

References

Ortega, L. (2013). Ways forward for a bi/multilingual turn in SLA. In S. May, The multilingual turn: Implications for SLA, TESOL and bilingual education (pp. 32- 53). New York: Routledge.

Peirce, B. N. (1995). Social identity, investment and language learning. TESOL Quarterly, 29(1), 9–31.

Phan, L. H. (2008). Teaching English as an international language: Identity, resistance and negotiation. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, Ltd.

Varghese, M., Morgan, B., Johnston, B., & Johnson, K. (2005). Theorizing language teacher identity: Three perspectives and beyond. Journal of Language, Identity, and Education, 4(1), 21–44.

Reviewed by
Vashti Lee
Georgetown University, USA
<vl219atmarkgeorgetown.edu>

© Copyright rests with authors. Please cite TESL-EJ appropriately.
Editor’s Note: The HTML version contains no page numbers. Please use the PDF version of this article for citations.

© 1994–2026 TESL-EJ, ISSN 1072-4303
Copyright of articles rests with the authors.