• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

site logo
The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language
search
  • Home
  • About TESL-EJ
  • Vols. 1-15 (1994-2012)
    • Volume 1
      • Volume 1, Number 1
      • Volume 1, Number 2
      • Volume 1, Number 3
      • Volume 1, Number 4
    • Volume 2
      • Volume 2, Number 1 — March 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 2 — September 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 3 — January 1997
      • Volume 2, Number 4 — June 1997
    • Volume 3
      • Volume 3, Number 1 — November 1997
      • Volume 3, Number 2 — March 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 3 — September 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 4 — January 1999
    • Volume 4
      • Volume 4, Number 1 — July 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 2 — November 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 3 — May 2000
      • Volume 4, Number 4 — December 2000
    • Volume 5
      • Volume 5, Number 1 — April 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 2 — September 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 3 — December 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 4 — March 2002
    • Volume 6
      • Volume 6, Number 1 — June 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 2 — September 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 3 — December 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 4 — March 2003
    • Volume 7
      • Volume 7, Number 1 — June 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 2 — September 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 3 — December 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 4 — March 2004
    • Volume 8
      • Volume 8, Number 1 — June 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 2 — September 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 3 — December 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 4 — March 2005
    • Volume 9
      • Volume 9, Number 1 — June 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 2 — September 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 3 — December 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 4 — March 2006
    • Volume 10
      • Volume 10, Number 1 — June 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 2 — September 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 3 — December 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 4 — March 2007
    • Volume 11
      • Volume 11, Number 1 — June 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 2 — September 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 3 — December 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 4 — March 2008
    • Volume 12
      • Volume 12, Number 1 — June 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 2 — September 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 3 — December 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 4 — March 2009
    • Volume 13
      • Volume 13, Number 1 — June 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 2 — September 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 3 — December 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 4 — March 2010
    • Volume 14
      • Volume 14, Number 1 — June 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 2 – September 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 3 – December 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 4 – March 2011
    • Volume 15
      • Volume 15, Number 1 — June 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 2 — September 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 3 — December 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 4 — March 2012
  • Vols. 16-Current
    • Volume 16
      • Volume 16, Number 1 — June 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 2 — September 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 3 — December 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 4 – March 2013
    • Volume 17
      • Volume 17, Number 1 – May 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 2 – August 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 3 – November 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 4 – February 2014
    • Volume 18
      • Volume 18, Number 1 – May 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 2 – August 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 3 – November 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 4 – February 2015
    • Volume 19
      • Volume 19, Number 1 – May 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 2 – August 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 3 – November 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 4 – February 2016
    • Volume 20
      • Volume 20, Number 1 – May 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 2 – August 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 3 – November 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 4 – February 2017
    • Volume 21
      • Volume 21, Number 1 – May 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 2 – August 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 3 – November 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 4 – February 2018
    • Volume 22
      • Volume 22, Number 1 – May 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 2 – August 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 3 – November 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 4 – February 2019
    • Volume 23
      • Volume 23, Number 1 – May 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 2 – August 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 3 – November 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 4 – February 2020
    • Volume 24
      • Volume 24, Number 1 – May 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 2 – August 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 3 – November 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 4 – February 2021
    • Volume 25
      • Volume 25, Number 1 – May 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 2 – August 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 3 – November 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 4 – February 2022
    • Volume 26
      • Volume 26, Number 1 – May 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 2 – August 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 3 – November 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 4 – February 2023
    • Volume 27
      • Volume 27, Number 1 – May 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 2 – August 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 3 – November 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 4 – February 2024
    • Volume 28
      • Volume 28, Number 1 – May 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 2 – August 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 3 – November 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 4 – February 2025
    • Volume 29
      • Volume 29, Number 1 – May 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 2 – August 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 3 – November 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 4 – February 2026
    • Volume 30
      • Volume 30, Number 1 – May 2026
      • Volume 30, Number 2 – August 2026
  • Books
  • How to Submit
    • Submission Info
    • Ethical Standards for Authors and Reviewers
    • TESL-EJ Style Sheet for Authors
    • TESL-EJ Tips for Authors
    • Book Review Policy
    • Media Review Policy
    • TESL-EJ Special issues
    • APA Style Guide
  • Editorial Board
  • Support

Integrating Writing Strategies in EFL/ESL University Contexts: A Writing-Across-the-Curriculum Approach

August 2013 – Volume 17, Number 2

Integrating Writing Strategies in EFL/ESL University Contexts:
A Writing-Across-the-Curriculum Approach

Author: Jennifer Lynn Craig (2013)  
Publisher: New York: Routledge
Pages ISBN Price
187 pages 978-0-415-89671-9 $39.95 USD

In Integrating Writing Strategies in EFL/ESL University Contexts: A Writing-Across-the-Curriculum-Approach, Jennifer Lynn Craig sets out to provide straightforward teaching strategies that can be adapted to fit into developed lesson plans. Throughout the book, Craig effectively explains the relevance of Writing Across the Curriculum (WAC) pedagogy in EFL/ESL classrooms by providing a balance of theoretical background and examples of application. The text is not only a useful resource to EFL/ESL teachers, but to any university instructor. Craig addresses this practicality when she describes the constant increase in the number of international students enrolled at universities in the United States, which implies that faculty members will probably encounter many students whose first language is not English (p. 2). Overall, Craig accomplishes her mission to provide “practical advice” in an “efficient resource” (p. i). The language used is accessible and the pedagogical strategies seem easy to select, adapt, and implement.

The book is divided into four main parts that together create a valid flow of reasoning to show readers the relationship between WAC and EFL/ESL teaching. Craig starts by discussing WAC’s background. She breaks WAC up into two facets that form a backbone for the rest of the book’s pedagogy: writing to learn and writing in the disciplines (p. 14). Then the majority of the book is dedicated to areas that could be improved within the classroom if WAC pedagogy is executed properly. Towards the end, Craig addresses some of the possible complications that could arise within the university after WAC is proposed. She adequately addresses the concerns of those who may oppose WAC and stresses the need for teachers to work together for the benefit and success of students. Finally, Craig concludes with a convincing call to action. She encourages teachers to adopt her strategies and then evaluate the new pedagogy for its effectiveness (p. 171).

Despite the designation of “writing strategies” in the book’s title, many of the examples mentioned in the chapters address oral presentations in addition to writing. The lack of conciseness is a little unexpected if readers intentionally select the book for the writing component and are bombarded by an almost equal amount of strategies about effective communication. However, the link between writing and oral presentations is apparent and teachers are encouraged to consider the addition of presentations as expansions of writing assignments. Craig suggests that creating a connection between writing and presenting is especially valuable (p. 95).

Although Craig reasonably establishes her credibility in the preface, she does not provide any personal examples of useful pedagogical strategies in the book. Instead, she chooses to include a few teacher profiles and examples of activities and assignments that have been implemented by other instructors. Despite the ultimate usefulness of these sections, Craig’s own experiences would have helped emphasize her credibility and make the text more relatable. Most pedagogical work seems to be a discussion of the successful strategies used in one’s own classroom, so this was a change from the norm that was somewhat difficult to overlook.

Even though Craig could have addressed some of her teaching practices, the variety of strategies in the text offers dynamic options for readers. One key feature in many of the chapters is the use of teacher profiles. The classroom practices of four teachers are included to discuss a range of student abilities. After the teachers are introduced, Craig continues to utilize their experiences during the subsequent chapters. The first two teachers, Celia and Robert, are EFL/ESL teachers with low intermediate and advanced students, respectively (p. 51). The next teacher, Alex, is a business professor who teaches in English (p. 54) and the final teacher, Sonal, is an engineering professor (p. 67). By dedicating a somewhat equal amount of time to EFL/ESL teachers and more traditional teachers, Craig again sufficiently shows that every instructor can benefit from the described strategies.

Another useful section called “in practice” is included at the end of almost every chapter. It provides a description of a specific activity or assignment that has already been utilized and deemed effective. A range of instructors from other countries and numerous disciplines provide each of the examples. Some of the international professors are from universities in Mexico and Israel, while the U.S. instructors are from universities like MIT, Penn State, and Columbia. Since readers are expected to apply the strategies discussed in each chapter, they are given at least two specific examples that guide them in their own application of the material. When combined with the teacher narratives, readers are able to clearly understand the helpfulness of Craig’s proposed pedagogy and should be able to use it if desired.

While the text is approachable enough to be utilized by non-EFL/ESL teachers, it does include some valuable culture specific advice to consider when working with students who are not native speakers. One example of the way culture impacts writing is when students do not inherently organize their work in a way that is easily understood by readers (p. 33). Also, many students from other cultures are accustomed to a distanced relationship with professors, which makes it difficult to reinforce a mentor relationship (p. 152). Although the focus on EFL/ESL is not constantly at the forefront, it is always present and mentioned at least somewhere in each section.

Overall, Craig’s book is a practical piece of pedagogy that gives teachers detailed starting points to implement the described strategies. It demonstrates the importance of WAC as a necessity to produce successful graduates and examines the specific usefulness of WAC to EFL/ESL students in an increasingly globalized world. Teachers can all benefit from some component of the WAC pedagogy even if they do not believe they need to adapt their class for English language learners.

Reviewed by
Alyssa Miller
North Dakota State University, Fargo, North Dakota, USA
<Alyssa.Milleratmarkndsu.edu>

© Copyright rests with authors. Please cite TESL-EJ appropriately.

Editor’s Note: The HTML version contains no page numbers. Please use the PDF version of this article for citations.

© 1994–2026 TESL-EJ, ISSN 1072-4303
Copyright of articles rests with the authors.