• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

site logo
The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language
search
  • Home
  • About TESL-EJ
  • Vols. 1-15 (1994-2012)
    • Volume 1
      • Volume 1, Number 1
      • Volume 1, Number 2
      • Volume 1, Number 3
      • Volume 1, Number 4
    • Volume 2
      • Volume 2, Number 1 — March 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 2 — September 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 3 — January 1997
      • Volume 2, Number 4 — June 1997
    • Volume 3
      • Volume 3, Number 1 — November 1997
      • Volume 3, Number 2 — March 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 3 — September 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 4 — January 1999
    • Volume 4
      • Volume 4, Number 1 — July 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 2 — November 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 3 — May 2000
      • Volume 4, Number 4 — December 2000
    • Volume 5
      • Volume 5, Number 1 — April 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 2 — September 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 3 — December 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 4 — March 2002
    • Volume 6
      • Volume 6, Number 1 — June 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 2 — September 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 3 — December 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 4 — March 2003
    • Volume 7
      • Volume 7, Number 1 — June 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 2 — September 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 3 — December 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 4 — March 2004
    • Volume 8
      • Volume 8, Number 1 — June 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 2 — September 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 3 — December 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 4 — March 2005
    • Volume 9
      • Volume 9, Number 1 — June 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 2 — September 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 3 — December 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 4 — March 2006
    • Volume 10
      • Volume 10, Number 1 — June 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 2 — September 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 3 — December 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 4 — March 2007
    • Volume 11
      • Volume 11, Number 1 — June 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 2 — September 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 3 — December 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 4 — March 2008
    • Volume 12
      • Volume 12, Number 1 — June 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 2 — September 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 3 — December 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 4 — March 2009
    • Volume 13
      • Volume 13, Number 1 — June 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 2 — September 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 3 — December 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 4 — March 2010
    • Volume 14
      • Volume 14, Number 1 — June 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 2 – September 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 3 – December 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 4 – March 2011
    • Volume 15
      • Volume 15, Number 1 — June 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 2 — September 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 3 — December 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 4 — March 2012
  • Vols. 16-Current
    • Volume 16
      • Volume 16, Number 1 — June 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 2 — September 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 3 — December 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 4 – March 2013
    • Volume 17
      • Volume 17, Number 1 – May 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 2 – August 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 3 – November 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 4 – February 2014
    • Volume 18
      • Volume 18, Number 1 – May 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 2 – August 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 3 – November 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 4 – February 2015
    • Volume 19
      • Volume 19, Number 1 – May 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 2 – August 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 3 – November 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 4 – February 2016
    • Volume 20
      • Volume 20, Number 1 – May 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 2 – August 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 3 – November 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 4 – February 2017
    • Volume 21
      • Volume 21, Number 1 – May 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 2 – August 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 3 – November 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 4 – February 2018
    • Volume 22
      • Volume 22, Number 1 – May 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 2 – August 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 3 – November 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 4 – February 2019
    • Volume 23
      • Volume 23, Number 1 – May 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 2 – August 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 3 – November 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 4 – February 2020
    • Volume 24
      • Volume 24, Number 1 – May 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 2 – August 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 3 – November 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 4 – February 2021
    • Volume 25
      • Volume 25, Number 1 – May 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 2 – August 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 3 – November 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 4 – February 2022
    • Volume 26
      • Volume 26, Number 1 – May 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 2 – August 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 3 – November 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 4 – February 2023
    • Volume 27
      • Volume 27, Number 1 – May 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 2 – August 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 3 – November 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 4 – February 2024
    • Volume 28
      • Volume 28, Number 1 – May 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 2 – August 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 3 – November 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 4 – February 2025
    • Volume 29
      • Volume 29, Number 1 – May 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 2 – August 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 3 – November 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 4 – February 2026
    • Volume 30
      • Volume 30, Number 1 – May 2026
      • Volume 30, Number 2 – August 2026
  • Books
  • How to Submit
    • Submission Info
    • Ethical Standards for Authors and Reviewers
    • TESL-EJ Style Sheet for Authors
    • TESL-EJ Tips for Authors
    • Book Review Policy
    • Media Review Policy
    • TESL-EJ Special issues
    • APA Style Guide
  • Editorial Board
  • Support

Preventing Long Term ELs

June 2012 – Volume 16, Number 1

Preventing Long Term ELs: Transforming Schools to Meet Core Standards

Author: Margarita Espino Calderón & Liliana Minaya-Rowe (2011)  
Publisher: Thousand Oaks: Corwin
Pages ISBN Price
147 pages 978-1-4129-7416-5 $31.95 USD

Authors of Preventing Long-Term ELs: Transforming Schools to Meet Core Standards, Margarita Espino Calderón and Liliana Minaya-Rowe, were both principal and coprinicipal investigators of the 2003-2008 John Hopkins University/Carnegie Corporation of New York Project ExC-ELL: Expediting Comprehension for English Learners. The five year study resulted in a refined staff development program for content-area teachers who have English Learners in their classrooms. Calderón and Rowe highlight the underpinnings of their project ExC-ELL in their book, Preventing Long-Term ELs: Transforming Schools to Meet Core Standards, all the while providing a well organized and approachable means to counteract the academic failure experienced this decade by upper elementary, middle, and high school English Learners.

As the number of English Learners (ELs) in U.S. schools continues to rise, Calderón and Rowe point out the fact that “schools and districts have been overwhelmed by the increases in the EL populations” (p. 2) More importantly though, the authors quote, “The unexpected and growing numbers of ELs means that these students are no longer only the responsibility of ESL or bilingual teachers. Entire school faculties must serve ELs, overwhelming mainstream staff” (p. 2).

The authors paint a disheartening image of the widening achievement gap that exists between White and Latino students and other minority students. They note that many students, who enter U.S. schools in kindergarten or first grade, are second- or third-generation immigrants do not developed the literacy skills needed to compete academically. Consequently, the idea of graduating high school, for Long Term English Learners (LT-EL), becomes less and less attainable which in turn contributes to the high dropout rates by minority students.

The authors of this book therefore pose the following questions: What has happened or has not happened in our elementary schools that permits this kind of failure? Why are secondary administrators folding their arms and not providing appropriate immediate interventions?

A thoughtful review of current research led Calderón and her colleagues to carry out two field studies: Expediting Comprehension for English Language Learners (ExC-ELL) and Reading Instructional Goals for Older Readers (RIGOR). Both studies provide “tools for schools” in addressing the needs of ELs. The book is structured around the four main components of the ExC-ELL and RIGOR staff development programs: (1) Quality Professional Development, (2) Coaching, (3) Measuring Teacher Implementation and its Impact on Students, and (4) Preparing Administrators to Support and Observe Literacy Instruction in Content Classrooms.

As Calderón and Rowe intended, the layout of the book is conceptually desirable as each chapter offers substantive concepts that could be presented on its own. Each chapter provides a framework for discussion as the issues surrounding LT-ELs are brought to light. Adequate statistics are provided placing particular emphasis on the number of U.S. born ELs that, due to a weak foundation in literacy, remain in the ESL program throughout middle and secondary school. The authors conclude that the most important factor in attaining EL success is the quality of instruction. As chapter one highlights, the rapid influx of ELs into U.S. schools has posed many challenges for schools and districts nationwide. Therefore, the authors contend that the academic fate of ELs lies in all of our hands, and teachers and school administrators should not place such responsibility solely on the ESL teacher(s).

Chapter three details the framework for preventing LT-ELs. Calderón and Rowe focus on 10 features and structures of quality instruction and effective schooling for ELs and school success. The 10 features of school success can be applied to a broad range of educational settings. The authors also provide topics for discussion, as well as a useful tool to rate the features of your current professional development instruction.

Through field studies and current research analysis, authors Calderón and Rowe outline the characteristics of high quality instruction, placing much emphasis on Vocabulary instruction and development. The book provides “the basic premises of vocabulary instruction that has helped ELs and struggling students accelerate their English learning and academic success” (Calderón, 2007). Three critical messages that the authors link to reading comprehension are recognized. The first of these suggests that vocabulary instruction begin in the early years, pre-school, and continue throughout the school years. Secondly, research proves that vocabulary instruction, if taught explicitly, can help develop phonological awareness and lead to increased reading comprehension skills. Therefore, vocabulary instruction should be long-term and comprehensive (p. 51).

Contrary to belief, the authors state, “Drawing pictures of the word does not necessarily mean that a word will be used by the student” (p. 52). We see this current method of instruction, illustration of key words, used in classrooms all too often. As suggested by the authors, a more collaborative effort must take place to ensure the development of academic language. We are responsible for teaching vocabulary across all content areas (science, math, social studies, and language arts). Therefore, Calderón and Rowe encourage teachers to be selective and strategic when selecting words to teach. What are the vocabulary words most useful in learning the content and concepts student are about to read? The selection of words is a critical component to student success. Equally as important to the selection of words is the ability of ELs to orally describe, question, or summarize what they have learned. Language is acquired through and by oral discourse. Therefore, students need to play an active role in the classroom by participating in collaborative activities that provide ample opportunities to use their newly learned vocabulary. Perhaps, the most interesting component of Calderón and Rowe’s findings is the integration of academic vocabulary in student writing. Teachers have become accustomed to false encouragement. All too often, we encourage our ELs to write “in their own words.” Calderón and Rowe bring to our attention the detrimental effects that this instructional approach can have on student success. As suggested by the authors, a more appropriate and effective approach to language instruction involves “word categories.” An in depth description as to how to cluster words for instruction (Tiers 1, 2, and 3) is outlined in chapter five.

In chapter seven, the authors discuss many writing strategies. These strategies are great to use with ELs, but can be implemented with struggling writers from any educational or cultural background. In order for ELs to be successful in school, they must develop both reading and writing skills. If they have not developed adequate writing skills, then they will never be fully literate. As teachers then, it is our moral duty to provide the quality instruction that Calderón and Rowe outline in their book. Since reading the book, I have tried to be more explicit in my expectations for writing. I no longer allow my students to write “in their own words.”

The authors of this book have done an incredible job honing in on the issues surrounding LT-ELs. Their research and experiences with ELs are a valuable contribution to educational communities worldwide. Calderón and Rowe’s “tools” for meeting the immediate needs of ELs can be applied in and among any educational setting. The education of nontraditional students is a commonality that every educator is faced with in his or her career. This book offers concrete models and case studies of “best practices and optimal language acquisition models” that are approachable and have proven success.

Reviewed by
Morgan Maris
Charlotte Mecklenburg Schools, North Carolina, USA
<morgan.marisatmarkcms.k12.nc.us>

© Copyright rests with authors. Please cite TESL-EJ appropriately.Editor’s Note: The HTML version contains no page numbers. Please use the PDF version of this article for citations.

© 1994–2026 TESL-EJ, ISSN 1072-4303
Copyright of articles rests with the authors.