• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

site logo
The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language
search
  • Home
  • About TESL-EJ
  • Vols. 1-15 (1994-2012)
    • Volume 1
      • Volume 1, Number 1
      • Volume 1, Number 2
      • Volume 1, Number 3
      • Volume 1, Number 4
    • Volume 2
      • Volume 2, Number 1 — March 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 2 — September 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 3 — January 1997
      • Volume 2, Number 4 — June 1997
    • Volume 3
      • Volume 3, Number 1 — November 1997
      • Volume 3, Number 2 — March 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 3 — September 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 4 — January 1999
    • Volume 4
      • Volume 4, Number 1 — July 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 2 — November 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 3 — May 2000
      • Volume 4, Number 4 — December 2000
    • Volume 5
      • Volume 5, Number 1 — April 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 2 — September 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 3 — December 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 4 — March 2002
    • Volume 6
      • Volume 6, Number 1 — June 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 2 — September 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 3 — December 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 4 — March 2003
    • Volume 7
      • Volume 7, Number 1 — June 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 2 — September 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 3 — December 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 4 — March 2004
    • Volume 8
      • Volume 8, Number 1 — June 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 2 — September 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 3 — December 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 4 — March 2005
    • Volume 9
      • Volume 9, Number 1 — June 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 2 — September 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 3 — December 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 4 — March 2006
    • Volume 10
      • Volume 10, Number 1 — June 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 2 — September 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 3 — December 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 4 — March 2007
    • Volume 11
      • Volume 11, Number 1 — June 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 2 — September 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 3 — December 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 4 — March 2008
    • Volume 12
      • Volume 12, Number 1 — June 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 2 — September 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 3 — December 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 4 — March 2009
    • Volume 13
      • Volume 13, Number 1 — June 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 2 — September 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 3 — December 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 4 — March 2010
    • Volume 14
      • Volume 14, Number 1 — June 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 2 – September 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 3 – December 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 4 – March 2011
    • Volume 15
      • Volume 15, Number 1 — June 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 2 — September 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 3 — December 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 4 — March 2012
  • Vols. 16-Current
    • Volume 16
      • Volume 16, Number 1 — June 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 2 — September 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 3 — December 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 4 – March 2013
    • Volume 17
      • Volume 17, Number 1 – May 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 2 – August 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 3 – November 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 4 – February 2014
    • Volume 18
      • Volume 18, Number 1 – May 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 2 – August 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 3 – November 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 4 – February 2015
    • Volume 19
      • Volume 19, Number 1 – May 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 2 – August 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 3 – November 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 4 – February 2016
    • Volume 20
      • Volume 20, Number 1 – May 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 2 – August 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 3 – November 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 4 – February 2017
    • Volume 21
      • Volume 21, Number 1 – May 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 2 – August 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 3 – November 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 4 – February 2018
    • Volume 22
      • Volume 22, Number 1 – May 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 2 – August 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 3 – November 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 4 – February 2019
    • Volume 23
      • Volume 23, Number 1 – May 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 2 – August 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 3 – November 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 4 – February 2020
    • Volume 24
      • Volume 24, Number 1 – May 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 2 – August 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 3 – November 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 4 – February 2021
    • Volume 25
      • Volume 25, Number 1 – May 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 2 – August 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 3 – November 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 4 – February 2022
    • Volume 26
      • Volume 26, Number 1 – May 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 2 – August 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 3 – November 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 4 – February 2023
    • Volume 27
      • Volume 27, Number 1 – May 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 2 – August 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 3 – November 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 4 – February 2024
    • Volume 28
      • Volume 28, Number 1 – May 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 2 – August 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 3 – November 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 4 – February 2025
    • Volume 29
      • Volume 29, Number 1 – May 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 2 – August 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 3 – November 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 4 – February 2026
    • Volume 30
      • Volume 30, Number 1 – May 2026
      • Volume 30, Number 2 – August 2026
  • Books
  • How to Submit
    • Submission Info
    • Ethical Standards for Authors and Reviewers
    • TESL-EJ Style Sheet for Authors
    • TESL-EJ Tips for Authors
    • Book Review Policy
    • Media Review Policy
    • TESL-EJ Special issues
    • APA Style Guide
  • Editorial Board
  • Support

Teaching College Writing to Diverse Student Populations

March 2012 – Volume 15, Number 4

Teaching College Writing to Diverse Student Populations

Author: Dana R. Ferris (2009)  
Publisher: University of Michigan Press
Pages ISBN Price
169 pages 978-0-472-03337-9 $27.50 USD

Teaching College Writing to Diverse Student Populations by Dana Ferris is an insightful work that explores the role college and university personnel must play in order to assist second language learners (L2) in their academic progression towards English proficiency. By placing responsibility back into the right hands, Ferris proclaims that second language specialists, composition specialists, program administrators, and developers in colleges and universities must work together and do their individual part to ensure that the needs of all L2 students in higher education are adequately met. In arguing her ideas, Ferris positions L2 students at the forefront of her book rather than at the margins, discussing how their respective and unique cultural and linguistic background should dictate curriculum and instruction. Her book is driven by a belief that higher education, though distinctly different from K-12 education, should continue to serve and meet the needs of a diverse student population. She argues against a college culture that ineffectively develops the academic writing and literacy skills of L2 students. Her book advocates for L2 students in post-secondary institutions, suggesting that a one-size-fits-all approach cannot adequately educate the diverse L2 student population and that such an approach prevents L2 students from matriculating and graduating from American colleges and universities.

The thesis of Ferris’ book is discovering the L2 learner in post-secondary education. From beginning to end, she posits that before a teacher can meet the academic writing needs of L2 students, teachers must first understand the complex and unique characteristics, backgrounds, motivations, strengths, and weaknesses of a diverse L2 student population. In order to situate L2 students at the center of her discussion, Ferris’ book is broken into three parts, each section building upon the previous chapter and addressing various ESL topics from the perspective of L2 students. Never deviating from her thesis, an awareness of L2 students’ academic needs unifies the numerous topics and subtopics that are explored within her book.

In Part 1: Foundations, Ferris unravels the multidimensional layers of L2 students, addressing their varied identities. She notes that with more students attending university, the linguistic, cultural, ethnic, and socioeconomic status of college students have expanded. Recognizing this trend, she identifies three different categories of L2 students: international students, late-arriving resident students, and early-arriving resident students. She describes international students as visa students who are pursuing an American degree with the intent of returning to their home country. Late-arriving resident students are defined as students that moved to the United States after completing high school in their home country. These students typically have minimal or no English foundation. Lastly, early-arriving resident students arrived in the U.S. prior to the age of ten and have resided in America for eight or more years, attending American public schools. The descriptions of these L2 students are not meant to be exhaustive; rather, Ferris is persistent in reiterating that there are multiple variations within these three categories of L2 students.

Furthering the idea of differences among L2 students, Ferris uses a description of real life students (John, Hector, Luciana) and a sample of their writing to represent international, early-arriving, and late-arriving resident students. Their distinct stories and writings reveal the varying degree of knowledge, experiences, motivations, and language skills among L2 students, and how these characteristics affect their mastery of academic language whether in reading, writing, or speaking. Ferris shows that the diversity (strengths and weaknesses) among the L2 student population needs to be taken into account as educators try to meet L2 students individualized needs throughout the teaching and learning process.

Part 2: Implications addresses the practical consequences of readers gaining an understanding of diverse L2 student groups. Ferris shows that with an awareness of L2 student characteristics, other issues that affect their writing development in higher education can be critically examined, revealing which institutional practices either assist or hinder L2 students. Part 2 guides the reader through a thorough discussion of all the institutional challenges and issues L2 students face as they struggle to gain a command of the English language while simultaneously moving through post-secondary education. Ferris argues that from curriculum, placement, assessment, and teacher preparation to course design and classroom instruction, all of these areas should be contingent upon the diverse needs of L2 students. She fervently argues against a formulaic approach that arbitrarily accommodates L2 students with little regards to their varying needs.. Instead, every aspect of an L2 student’s education in the post-secondary setting should be dependent upon that student. By not acknowledging differences among second language learners and grouping them into an all-inclusive educational pile, they are ill prepared for the journey ahead. Ferris provides ample suggestions and ideas to consider, assisting educators in better meeting the needs of all L2 student writers.

The last portion of Ferris’ book, Part 3: Applications serves as a continued guide, offering teachers direction. Restating the problem through the voices of John, Hector, and Luciana, Ferris brings a human quality back into her discussion. She helps her readers understand that these students are not nameless individuals and that the suggestions offered at the end of her book are only impactful if L2 students are at the center of the discussion and implementation process.

Ferris’ book has more strengths than limitations. The book’s strength resides in its ability to serve as a teacher’s guide for L2 instructors, containing many rich resources. An in-depth review of literature is initially conducted and presented throughout the book, providing research and excerpts from countless sources. This explanatory information not only strengthens Ferris’ claims but also adds to her readers’ level of understanding. In addition, at the end of each chapter numerous questions are posed to ensure that the reader grasps the main concepts and ideas as well as engages in a process of self-reflection. Figures are also included and used to outline and organize important terms, definitions, and information. Connecting theory to application, actual student writing is presented and critiqued to show variation among L2 students’ writing skills and to identify areas of need. Ferris also inserted her own personal experiences, observations, and thoughts about L2 students’ academic progression in the area of writing. All of these added resources aid in constructing a more complete guide for teachers as they attempt to understanding and properly educate L2 students. The only substantial limitation is the lack of a substantial historical frame of reference. Although a brief history of L2 students in higher education was provides in the first few pages of the book, an extensive historical account may add greater depth to the discussion.

Teaching College Writing to Diverse Student Populations is an insightful text. Ferris challenges prior assumptions about L2 students. Individual reflection is inevitable as one finishes the book having gained a new perspective and strategies on how to best assist learners. Educators who interact with L2 students will this text an informative piece

Reviewed by
Abiola Farinde
The University of North Carolina Charlotte
<afarindeatmarkuncc.edu>

© Copyright rests with authors. Please cite TESL-EJ appropriately.Editor’s Note: The HTML version contains no page numbers. Please use the PDF version of this article for citations.

© 1994–2026 TESL-EJ, ISSN 1072-4303
Copyright of articles rests with the authors.