• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

site logo
The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language
search
  • Home
  • About TESL-EJ
  • Vols. 1-15 (1994-2012)
    • Volume 1
      • Volume 1, Number 1
      • Volume 1, Number 2
      • Volume 1, Number 3
      • Volume 1, Number 4
    • Volume 2
      • Volume 2, Number 1 — March 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 2 — September 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 3 — January 1997
      • Volume 2, Number 4 — June 1997
    • Volume 3
      • Volume 3, Number 1 — November 1997
      • Volume 3, Number 2 — March 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 3 — September 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 4 — January 1999
    • Volume 4
      • Volume 4, Number 1 — July 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 2 — November 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 3 — May 2000
      • Volume 4, Number 4 — December 2000
    • Volume 5
      • Volume 5, Number 1 — April 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 2 — September 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 3 — December 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 4 — March 2002
    • Volume 6
      • Volume 6, Number 1 — June 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 2 — September 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 3 — December 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 4 — March 2003
    • Volume 7
      • Volume 7, Number 1 — June 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 2 — September 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 3 — December 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 4 — March 2004
    • Volume 8
      • Volume 8, Number 1 — June 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 2 — September 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 3 — December 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 4 — March 2005
    • Volume 9
      • Volume 9, Number 1 — June 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 2 — September 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 3 — December 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 4 — March 2006
    • Volume 10
      • Volume 10, Number 1 — June 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 2 — September 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 3 — December 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 4 — March 2007
    • Volume 11
      • Volume 11, Number 1 — June 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 2 — September 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 3 — December 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 4 — March 2008
    • Volume 12
      • Volume 12, Number 1 — June 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 2 — September 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 3 — December 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 4 — March 2009
    • Volume 13
      • Volume 13, Number 1 — June 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 2 — September 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 3 — December 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 4 — March 2010
    • Volume 14
      • Volume 14, Number 1 — June 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 2 – September 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 3 – December 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 4 – March 2011
    • Volume 15
      • Volume 15, Number 1 — June 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 2 — September 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 3 — December 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 4 — March 2012
  • Vols. 16-Current
    • Volume 16
      • Volume 16, Number 1 — June 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 2 — September 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 3 — December 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 4 – March 2013
    • Volume 17
      • Volume 17, Number 1 – May 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 2 – August 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 3 – November 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 4 – February 2014
    • Volume 18
      • Volume 18, Number 1 – May 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 2 – August 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 3 – November 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 4 – February 2015
    • Volume 19
      • Volume 19, Number 1 – May 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 2 – August 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 3 – November 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 4 – February 2016
    • Volume 20
      • Volume 20, Number 1 – May 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 2 – August 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 3 – November 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 4 – February 2017
    • Volume 21
      • Volume 21, Number 1 – May 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 2 – August 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 3 – November 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 4 – February 2018
    • Volume 22
      • Volume 22, Number 1 – May 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 2 – August 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 3 – November 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 4 – February 2019
    • Volume 23
      • Volume 23, Number 1 – May 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 2 – August 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 3 – November 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 4 – February 2020
    • Volume 24
      • Volume 24, Number 1 – May 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 2 – August 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 3 – November 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 4 – February 2021
    • Volume 25
      • Volume 25, Number 1 – May 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 2 – August 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 3 – November 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 4 – February 2022
    • Volume 26
      • Volume 26, Number 1 – May 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 2 – August 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 3 – November 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 4 – February 2023
    • Volume 27
      • Volume 27, Number 1 – May 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 2 – August 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 3 – November 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 4 – February 2024
    • Volume 28
      • Volume 28, Number 1 – May 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 2 – August 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 3 – November 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 4 – February 2025
    • Volume 29
      • Volume 29, Number 1 – May 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 2 – August 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 3 – November 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 4 – February 2026
    • Volume 30
      • Volume 30, Number 1 – May 2026
      • Volume 30, Number 2 – August 2026
  • Books
  • How to Submit
    • Submission Info
    • Ethical Standards for Authors and Reviewers
    • TESL-EJ Style Sheet for Authors
    • TESL-EJ Tips for Authors
    • Book Review Policy
    • Media Review Policy
    • TESL-EJ Special issues
    • APA Style Guide
  • Editorial Board
  • Support

Murder at Ocean View College

December 2007 — Volume 11, Number 3

 


Murder at Ocean View College

Author: Karen Batchelor (2006)  
Publisher: Boston: Houghton Mifflin
Pages ISBN Price
Pp. vii + 91 ISBN 978-0-618-76947-6 $11.07 US

Murder at Ocean View College is as simple as its title: a straightforward mystery story built along the lines of traditional mysteries à la Agatha Christie. A professor is murdered in her office at Ocean View College. Two students, a woman and a man, training at the college to become police officers, turn detectives although they have been forbidden to do so by their captain. They discover the truth, putting their lives in danger near the end by hiding on a narrow ledge of a college building seven floors above the ground, and in the final confrontation with the killer. Add to that a pinch of romance between the young protagonists and you get a mystery like dozens of others, as soon forgotten as read.

The motive for the murder is as follows: a group of students steals, copies and sells tests to football coach Kelly so that his players will get acceptable grades and be able to concentrate on this high-stakes sport. Ms. Ruby Quinn, the murdered English teacher who used to be engaged to the coach, hears about it and confronts him. Her present fiancé Harvey Taylor, the maths teacher, sees them meeting in dark corners and hallways and, out of jealousy, kills her by stabbing her in the heart with a pencil.

The two main characters, future police officers from different backgrounds, are nice enough, good kids, with good manners and religion, a bit bland. Their personal characteristics are both conventional and unconventional. Jade Lee, 19, lovely with a round face and long black hair, rather demure, is of Chinese descent (Hong Kong). Her father is dead and she lives with her mother, in a rather traditional way. Her mother refuses to see her boyfriend, Danny. Danny Soto, not yet 20, is tall and handsome, self-confident. His family is of Mexican origin: he has traditional, religious parents, two brothers and two sisters. His parents are not happy with Jade as their son’s girlfriend either.

The romance aspect of the story rests on Jade’s jealousy when Danny goes on a date with Amber (a pushy, overweight student who works in the duplicating office and has crush on him) to obtain information from her. Jade sees them and suspects the worst. Quite out of character, she uses her status as a self-appointed police officer to question Amber about the scam and shows she is not averse to using a little police brutality (for personal ends only). She gets over her jealousy when she realises that Danny was not cheating on her. In the end, both students become heroes and receive a plaque (Danny shows his off, Jade keeps hers at home) and the parents become reconciled to the idea of their relationship. All is well that ends well.

The novelette aims at political correctness. The women are referred to as Ms. The protagonists have equal roles in the book, neither being superior nor inferior to the other in terms of intelligence, daring, decision-making or physical strength. When their superiors start questioning them after Jade discovers the corpse, they ‘naturally’ turn to male Danny, who defers to Jade: she is the one who speaks. When Danny tackles the maths teacher, Jade intervenes and gets him out of a life-threatening situation. Still, Danny appears as a naïve young man, a bit of a show-off who does not think very far and tends to act before he thinks, whereas Jade is portrayed as mature, poised and clever. Danny fails miserably where Jade succeeds, for instance at interviewing people. Danny plunges headlong into the maths teacher’s office and is totally unable to improvise and find a good line of questioning. On the other hand, Jade’s interview of Amber is quite successful:

[Amber] started to walk away. Jade grabbed Amber’s pulled Amber’s shirt-tail and pulled her back. . . . Quickly, and without warning, Jade grabbed Amber’s wrist with the tattoo and twisted her arm behind her back. Amber squeaked again. Jade put her mouth to Amber’s ear and almost whispered this time. She spoke slowly and deliberately, but quite calmly. “If you ever get near Danny again, this snake is going to bite you in the backside.” She released the wrist abruptly and walked out of the building, head held high (p. 56).

There are unrealistic bits that wouldn’t convince even a teenage reader: the stabbing with a pencil, the episode when the maths teacher squashes a spider on his desk and Danny reads into it the proof of great cruelty and therefore guilt. And the story is not exempt from stereotyping: the character of Amber, the evil woman, is a stereotype of the fat girl who is also a terrible flirt, as well as a crook (she is involved in the scam). On the other hand, other secondary characters stand out as individuals: Crystal Jackson, the crime-unit leader, is tall (taller than Danny), black and beautiful. She also had trouble with her family because she was dating a white man. The man broke off with her. There is a strong parallel between her personal problems and Jade’s and Danny’s.

This book is not a run-of-the mill detective novel but a reader for foreign students learning English though nowhere does it say so on the book cover, front or back. There is just, in the acknowledgements page, rather cryptic thanks to, last among other people, “students who have suffered through several drafts, and who have enthusiastically asked again and again when the book would be finished and where they could buy it” (p. iii).

Karen Batchelor, the author, writes:

For years I tried to find material that was both linguistically accessible to my students, and interesting enough to hold their interest. Difficult. After trying several novels with my classes, I decided that they really needed something that did not yet exist. So, I started writing an ESL novel. (It is also appropriate for remedial and reluctant readers.) It took me several years, and I used my own students as guinea pigs. When I finally had a draft complete, I asked other teachers to try it with their students. I got very positive feedback. . . . The intended audience is high school and community college students. The reading level is approximately sixth grade.
(http://www.easyenglishtimes.com/teachers_tutors.html).

Karen Batchelor started teaching ESL at City College in San Francisco in 1975. She has published a great number of books: Discovering English (Newberry House, 1981), In Plain English (Addison-Wesley 1985), More Plain English (Addison-Wesley, 1986), The Writing Challenge (Macmillan, 1990), a four-book series The English Zone Book (Dominie Press, 1998-2000). She has also published articles and poetry. This seems to be her first published attempt at crime fiction.

The book offers no teaching aids or even tips. A reader is a reader, granted, but I, personally, would be at a loss to do anything with it (mostly because I don’t teach reading) except recommend it for reading at home. And yet, it has potential as class material. This 91-page book is divided into 32 chapters, each chapter being between one and a half and four pages long, a length which is manageable in one hour of class. In her review of the book, Darcy Meijer has more ideas. To her, each chapter

has a neat, discussable chunk of action and dialogue. Batchelor does not digress, and the vocabulary is well-chosen and embedded in plenty of context. Sentences are clear and direct, and most verbs are in the simple past tense. The action progresses evenly. Batchelor uses light comic touches and subplots to relieve the growing suspense. (http://peacecorpswriters.org/pages/2006/0607/607rv-murderocean.html)

She also describes how she would use the novelette with her students:

Batchelor has included lead-ins for classroom exercises throughout her mystery. Chapter 3 ends with Jade wondering who could have committed the murder. I would ask my students to list their suspects, along with motives and means. As chapter 16 closes, Danny is brainstorming how to deal with three other characters. My students would discuss this orally or in writing, using the new terms. Chapter 27 is a pure narrative, which students could act out, retell or do as a cloze text. In chapter 32 we learn that the murderer has confessed. Students could write out the statement or speak it before the class.

To me, the strong point of the book for EFL (and not ESL) students is that it reads like an introduction to life on an American college campus and, as such, may be of interest from a cultural point of view to foreign students. Pointing out differences and similarities between university campuses in France (or any other country) and the USA, for example the relative importance of sport, the training of police officers, inter-ethnic relationships—all this and more would make good topics for intercultural conversation.

Nicole Décuré

University of Toulouse, France
<decureatmarkcict.fr>

© Copyright rests with authors. Please cite TESL-EJ appropriately.

Editor’s Note: The HTML version contains no page numbers. Please use the PDF version of this article for citations.

© 1994–2026 TESL-EJ, ISSN 1072-4303
Copyright of articles rests with the authors.