• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

site logo
The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language
search
  • Home
  • About TESL-EJ
  • Vols. 1-15 (1994-2012)
    • Volume 1
      • Volume 1, Number 1
      • Volume 1, Number 2
      • Volume 1, Number 3
      • Volume 1, Number 4
    • Volume 2
      • Volume 2, Number 1 — March 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 2 — September 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 3 — January 1997
      • Volume 2, Number 4 — June 1997
    • Volume 3
      • Volume 3, Number 1 — November 1997
      • Volume 3, Number 2 — March 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 3 — September 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 4 — January 1999
    • Volume 4
      • Volume 4, Number 1 — July 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 2 — November 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 3 — May 2000
      • Volume 4, Number 4 — December 2000
    • Volume 5
      • Volume 5, Number 1 — April 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 2 — September 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 3 — December 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 4 — March 2002
    • Volume 6
      • Volume 6, Number 1 — June 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 2 — September 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 3 — December 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 4 — March 2003
    • Volume 7
      • Volume 7, Number 1 — June 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 2 — September 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 3 — December 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 4 — March 2004
    • Volume 8
      • Volume 8, Number 1 — June 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 2 — September 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 3 — December 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 4 — March 2005
    • Volume 9
      • Volume 9, Number 1 — June 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 2 — September 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 3 — December 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 4 — March 2006
    • Volume 10
      • Volume 10, Number 1 — June 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 2 — September 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 3 — December 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 4 — March 2007
    • Volume 11
      • Volume 11, Number 1 — June 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 2 — September 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 3 — December 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 4 — March 2008
    • Volume 12
      • Volume 12, Number 1 — June 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 2 — September 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 3 — December 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 4 — March 2009
    • Volume 13
      • Volume 13, Number 1 — June 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 2 — September 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 3 — December 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 4 — March 2010
    • Volume 14
      • Volume 14, Number 1 — June 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 2 – September 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 3 – December 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 4 – March 2011
    • Volume 15
      • Volume 15, Number 1 — June 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 2 — September 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 3 — December 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 4 — March 2012
  • Vols. 16-Current
    • Volume 16
      • Volume 16, Number 1 — June 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 2 — September 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 3 — December 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 4 – March 2013
    • Volume 17
      • Volume 17, Number 1 – May 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 2 – August 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 3 – November 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 4 – February 2014
    • Volume 18
      • Volume 18, Number 1 – May 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 2 – August 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 3 – November 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 4 – February 2015
    • Volume 19
      • Volume 19, Number 1 – May 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 2 – August 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 3 – November 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 4 – February 2016
    • Volume 20
      • Volume 20, Number 1 – May 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 2 – August 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 3 – November 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 4 – February 2017
    • Volume 21
      • Volume 21, Number 1 – May 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 2 – August 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 3 – November 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 4 – February 2018
    • Volume 22
      • Volume 22, Number 1 – May 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 2 – August 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 3 – November 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 4 – February 2019
    • Volume 23
      • Volume 23, Number 1 – May 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 2 – August 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 3 – November 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 4 – February 2020
    • Volume 24
      • Volume 24, Number 1 – May 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 2 – August 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 3 – November 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 4 – February 2021
    • Volume 25
      • Volume 25, Number 1 – May 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 2 – August 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 3 – November 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 4 – February 2022
    • Volume 26
      • Volume 26, Number 1 – May 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 2 – August 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 3 – November 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 4 – February 2023
    • Volume 27
      • Volume 27, Number 1 – May 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 2 – August 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 3 – November 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 4 – February 2024
    • Volume 28
      • Volume 28, Number 1 – May 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 2 – August 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 3 – November 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 4 – February 2025
    • Volume 29
      • Volume 29, Number 1 – May 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 2 – August 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 3 – November 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 4 – February 2026
    • Volume 30
      • Volume 30, Number 1 – May 2026
      • Volume 30, Number 2 – August 2026
  • Books
  • How to Submit
    • Submission Info
    • Ethical Standards for Authors and Reviewers
    • TESL-EJ Style Sheet for Authors
    • TESL-EJ Tips for Authors
    • Book Review Policy
    • Media Review Policy
    • TESL-EJ Special issues
    • APA Style Guide
  • Editorial Board
  • Support

Perspectives on Community College ESL Series Volume 1: Pedagogy, Programs, Curricula, and Assessment

June 2007 — Volume 11, Number 1

 

Perspectives on Community College ESL Series Volume 1:
Pedagogy, Programs, Curricula, and Assessment

Author: Marilyn Spaventa, Ed. (2006)  
Publisher: Alexandria, VA: TESOL, Inc.
Pages ISBN Price
Pp. vi + 242 978-193118534-9 £ $37.50 U.S.

Perhaps Perspectives on Community College ESL, this series’ title, is its weakest aspect, or at least the weakest of the compilation under review here. It simply does not do justice to the outstanding collection of chapters in this book that collectively provide an overview of the dynamic scope of ESL education occurring in community colleges around the world. For educators at any level interested in tapping into a wealth of creative ideas to inspire themselves or to use as models, Volume 1, in what is slated to be a three-part series, offers a substantial amount of intellectual stimulation. This four-part text covers Pedagogy (Part 1), Programs (Part 2), Curricula (Part 3), and Assessment (Part 4).

To my mind, Pedagogy contains both the most sophisticated and theoretical topics (a college/museum collaboration and a post-critical approach to language learning). Moreover, while these first two chapters of Part 1 are quite powerful and invigorating, they may also be the two chapters least likely to be duplicated by those teaching in community colleges where fighting to keep up with the significant workload limits the number or kind of ambitious projects one can undertake. However, the topics are quite sexy and were undoubtedly chosen as lead-off chapters based on their ability to raise the general opinion and profile of community college ESL programs and their faculty (in other words, their innovation and sophistication would make them appropriate for four-year as well as community college settings).

Though the volume starts out with an inspiring article about how a community college/museum collaboration transformed the pedagogical perspective of many faculty, the scale of such a project might dwarf those collaborative projects planned or previously executed by the average community college ESL instructor. While the authors convey contagious enthusiasm in their descriptions of how faculty from Montgomery College (Rockville, Maryland) engaged in a series of seminars with professionals from the Smithsonian Institution, many readers may ultimately be slightly depressed by the narrative of such a major undertaking that is beyond the resources of most cc’s. After the faculty’s orienting seminars, students were taken on one or more visits to the museum where they began work on projects associated with specific exhibits and were guided towards expanding their ability to analyze and critique the world around them. Though the authors promote the viability for other community colleges of similar projects with local institutions, such a project unquestionably requires a great deal of time and institutional support. Nonetheless, through its discussion of the mediation of culture and knowledge, the article certainly helps generate ideas that readers could adapt and adopt in their own classrooms.

In Chapter 2, “Caminante Si Hay Caminos: Toward a Postcritical ESL Approach for Community Colleges,” J. Andres Ramirez promotes action research and the dismantling of the status quo in the ESL classroom. In his classroom, Ramirez established a “co-constructed” learning community and guided his students toward an exploration of topics centered on social justice. Though Ramirez rightly points out the unspoken political framework of the more typical ESL classroom, many professors, human as they are, will resist the notion that their classrooms are ideological in nature, especially when the ideology is not openly expressed. Moreover, a project-oriented classroom, while rewarding, is more time-consuming for an instructor than simply following the more routine textbook-centered class. Nonetheless, I hope that readers will consider putting into action the rich model that Ramirez presents.

The Programs section covers the wide range of program types that can be found in community colleges depending on the needs of specific communities. Chapter 3, “ESL for a New South,” for example, describes how the ESL program at Gainesville College in Georgia has evolved from an intensive English model to a content-based program and finally to a more technologically focused information management model based on the needs of a Generation 1.5 student population. The author, Harriet Allison, emphasizes the need to help students develop the skills to become independent learners and researchers. She describes an ESL reading classroom focused on developing the ability to analyze and interpret information obtained from the Internet and a class structured on group work in which members teach each other as well as the instructor. Along the way, Allison debunks the common student fallacy that professors exist primarily to provide students with correct answers. Combining a New Literacy Studies perspective with a practical application, this article can serve as a model for programs searching for change.

Other chapters in Part 2 are equally thoughtful. Chapter 4, “Effectiveness of Community in Building College Success” promotes the use of learning communities for NNS of English. At Kingsborough Community College of the City University of New York, Marcia Babbitt writes of the effective linking of Sociology, Speech, and ESL courses to develop students’ abilities to read deeply and to collaborate. Babbitt supplies enough detail to make such a project seem both worthwhile and achievable.

In “Workforce Education in the Pacific Northwest Seafood Industry,” Lenhardt, Purcell, and Tyson describe the learning that can take place even in a project that does not entirely succeed. The project was an attempt by Clatsop Community College to establish workforce education in the local seafood industry. The participating instructors note that though the project was a short-lived one, their persistence did result in achieving some important objectives. One seafood plant ultimately permitted during work hours an onsite bilingual class (bilingual in this setting, to avoid the impression of special treatment, meaning native and Spanish speakers) that a selected group of employees attended. Importantly, NS workers who learned a little Spanish gained appreciation for the challenges their NNS coworkers face, and, for once, workers from all sectors who participated were on essentially equal footing. This article is particularly important because, while many community colleges currently find themselves tempted to focus on academically better prepared students, Clatsop reminds readers of the important inclusion of not only the word but the reality of “community” in two-year colleges.

In Curricula, authors discuss curricula in a variety of contexts ranging from analyzing uses of technology in the classroom to a vocational training program in Japan. Chapter 6, “Whose Technology is it Anyway?” covers the authors’ realization that online courses (even hybrid ones) do not provide enough learning support for many students, a significant percentage of whom have not yet developed the independent learning skills professors sometimes take for granted. Instead Brutza and Hayes promote the use of programs such as Academic Systems, which provides a variety of content readings as well as the support structures and processes of academic essay writing.

In Chapter 10, “Variety is the Spice of Life–and English Classes,” Lieske describes a program designed to improve the English ability of Japanese students in a vocational program focused on health and medical welfare. In the course of their English class, students engaged in multiple activities and projects which introduced many students to the Internet for the first time as well as guided them through preparing and delivering a presentation. Whereas initially many students expressed antipathy to the study of English, at the end they admitted an increased interest because of activities they judged relevant to their professional lives. Like previous chapters, these two effectively communicate what works and what does not while providing readers with insight into the successful design and structuring of curricula for a broad range of programs and needs.

The weak link in this section is “Curriculum Renewal in a Canadian Context: What, Why, and How.” Covering curricular reform at Queen’s University School of English in Kingston, Ontario, the article rather mundanely describes the move from a skills-based to an integrated language approach. Much of the text focuses on material compiled from a variety of other resources: a literature review, the conceptual background, and a needs assessment. While important, this information does not compensate for the lack of specifics. At the end one does not have a sense of what the curriculum actually is. Moreover, it is unclear how the Queen’s University program fits into a text on community colleges. Is there a community college housed within Queen’s University?

Without hesitation, however, Volume 1 of Perspectives on Community College ESL can be recommended as a book that successfully combines the theoretical and practical issues that face not only community college faculty but ESL practitioners at any level. Its focus and clarity are complemented by many instances of inspiration. It also sparks admiration for the thoughtful and grounded approaches to teaching constantly being implemented and revised around the world. Reading this book will be a rewarding experience for anyone committed to the processes of teaching and learning.

Kevin Hinkle
Raritan Valley Community College, New Jersey, U.S.A.
<rhinkleraritanval.edu>

© Copyright rests with authors. Please cite TESL-EJ appropriately.

Editor’s Note: The HTML version contains no page numbers. Please use the PDF version of this article for citations.

© 1994–2026 TESL-EJ, ISSN 1072-4303
Copyright of articles rests with the authors.