• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

site logo
The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language
search
  • Home
  • About TESL-EJ
  • Vols. 1-15 (1994-2012)
    • Volume 1
      • Volume 1, Number 1
      • Volume 1, Number 2
      • Volume 1, Number 3
      • Volume 1, Number 4
    • Volume 2
      • Volume 2, Number 1 — March 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 2 — September 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 3 — January 1997
      • Volume 2, Number 4 — June 1997
    • Volume 3
      • Volume 3, Number 1 — November 1997
      • Volume 3, Number 2 — March 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 3 — September 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 4 — January 1999
    • Volume 4
      • Volume 4, Number 1 — July 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 2 — November 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 3 — May 2000
      • Volume 4, Number 4 — December 2000
    • Volume 5
      • Volume 5, Number 1 — April 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 2 — September 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 3 — December 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 4 — March 2002
    • Volume 6
      • Volume 6, Number 1 — June 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 2 — September 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 3 — December 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 4 — March 2003
    • Volume 7
      • Volume 7, Number 1 — June 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 2 — September 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 3 — December 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 4 — March 2004
    • Volume 8
      • Volume 8, Number 1 — June 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 2 — September 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 3 — December 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 4 — March 2005
    • Volume 9
      • Volume 9, Number 1 — June 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 2 — September 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 3 — December 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 4 — March 2006
    • Volume 10
      • Volume 10, Number 1 — June 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 2 — September 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 3 — December 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 4 — March 2007
    • Volume 11
      • Volume 11, Number 1 — June 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 2 — September 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 3 — December 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 4 — March 2008
    • Volume 12
      • Volume 12, Number 1 — June 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 2 — September 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 3 — December 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 4 — March 2009
    • Volume 13
      • Volume 13, Number 1 — June 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 2 — September 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 3 — December 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 4 — March 2010
    • Volume 14
      • Volume 14, Number 1 — June 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 2 – September 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 3 – December 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 4 – March 2011
    • Volume 15
      • Volume 15, Number 1 — June 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 2 — September 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 3 — December 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 4 — March 2012
  • Vols. 16-Current
    • Volume 16
      • Volume 16, Number 1 — June 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 2 — September 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 3 — December 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 4 – March 2013
    • Volume 17
      • Volume 17, Number 1 – May 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 2 – August 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 3 – November 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 4 – February 2014
    • Volume 18
      • Volume 18, Number 1 – May 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 2 – August 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 3 – November 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 4 – February 2015
    • Volume 19
      • Volume 19, Number 1 – May 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 2 – August 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 3 – November 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 4 – February 2016
    • Volume 20
      • Volume 20, Number 1 – May 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 2 – August 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 3 – November 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 4 – February 2017
    • Volume 21
      • Volume 21, Number 1 – May 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 2 – August 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 3 – November 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 4 – February 2018
    • Volume 22
      • Volume 22, Number 1 – May 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 2 – August 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 3 – November 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 4 – February 2019
    • Volume 23
      • Volume 23, Number 1 – May 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 2 – August 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 3 – November 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 4 – February 2020
    • Volume 24
      • Volume 24, Number 1 – May 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 2 – August 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 3 – November 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 4 – February 2021
    • Volume 25
      • Volume 25, Number 1 – May 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 2 – August 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 3 – November 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 4 – February 2022
    • Volume 26
      • Volume 26, Number 1 – May 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 2 – August 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 3 – November 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 4 – February 2023
    • Volume 27
      • Volume 27, Number 1 – May 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 2 – August 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 3 – November 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 4 – February 2024
    • Volume 28
      • Volume 28, Number 1 – May 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 2 – August 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 3 – November 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 4 – February 2025
    • Volume 29
      • Volume 29, Number 1 – May 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 2 – August 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 3 – November 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 4 – February 2026
    • Volume 30
      • Volume 30, Number 1 – May 2026
      • Volume 30, Number 2 – August 2026
  • Books
  • How to Submit
    • Submission Info
    • Ethical Standards for Authors and Reviewers
    • TESL-EJ Style Sheet for Authors
    • TESL-EJ Tips for Authors
    • Book Review Policy
    • Media Review Policy
    • TESL-EJ Special issues
    • APA Style Guide
  • Editorial Board
  • Support

Technology and English Studies: Innovative Professional Paths

June 2007 — Volume 11, Number 1

 

Technology and English Studies: Innovative Professional Paths

Author: James A. Inman & Beth L. Hewett, Eds. (2006)  
Publisher: Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
Pages ISBN Price
Pp. xv + 250 0-8058-4589-5 (paper) $29.95 U.S.

To a varying degree, technology has become part of many educators’ practice. As this book’s title announces, the focus here is on the stories of some of the innovators who have put technology to use in English education and research. English educators trace their involvement with technology, often from typewriter to the World Wide Web in engaging and reflective first person accounts. Although only one writer specifically addresses ESL/EFL, ELT educators will find encouragement and perhaps shared experiences to consider while they themselves try to creatively incorporate technology in their classrooms. If these revelations are typical, then it seems innovators follow rather crooked paths in their efforts toward making the best use of technology.

This collection of essays is divided into four sections:

  1. The Past as Future
  2. Searching the Academy
  3. Pushing Boundaries
  4. Forging Beyond.

The book moves from inside the classroom outward to the worlds of art and business.

In Part One, four writers in different styles recount how their educational and academic paths interwove technology and English research and/or writing. Eric S. Rabkin’s essay, “Democracy, Real Work, and Falling in Love With the Net,” reveals his fascination with technology from childhood, specifically a communication device made of cans and wire connecting him to a friend, to presently enabling his students to put their work on the Internet. Throughout the essay Rabkin streses the importance of collaboration in building skills and communication. Another narrative, “Chip of the Old Board” by Nelson Hilton, describes a fascination a son inherited from his father: cataloging knowledge and making it accessible. The son then takes the practice into the 21st century, moving from key cards to markup language to online databases, which shift the form and requirements of composing.

These narratives do not prepare the reader for the narrative challenge of “Circe’s Mirror: Professing Liminality” by Wendy Morgan, who uses different short rhetorical stylings that sometimes reference previous sections and sometimes not. The narrative traces the development of a woman who began her adult life traditionally enough as helpmate (wife, homemaker, part-time teacher) to her spouse’s career. And then moved on to become a high school classics teacher and eventually–as of this writing–a university professor devoted to expanding the boundaries of textuality. The essay incorporates postmodern stylistic elements–switching from third person to first, not following a linear progression, allowing the reader options on what section to read next–in exploring Morgan’s thoughts, experiences, and reflections on her unusual career path.

Part 1 concludes with John Barber’s chapter on “All About . . . Eclecticism as a Professional Path to English Studies,” which details his various work experiences as video journalist, park ranger, copywriter, radio announcer, freelance writer, and finally writing teacher. Barber’s encounters with technology in his highly varied work experiences support his point that seeking and gaining a variety of experiences enhances one’s professional development.

Part Two, Searching the Academy, focuses on challenges faced by the various writers in their evolving use of technology in university settings. The middle two chapters concern teachers trying to incorporate technology into classrooms or writing programs in the face of resistance from departments or schools. Preceding the two chapters is Joanna Castner’s, “The Importance of Belief,” where she shows the power of collaboration in innovating by describing her participation in a graduate school technology group that led to the type of continued growth that her English graduate program fostered. This chapter provides some contrast to the next two, in which the writers describe their struggles to move away from the margins.

“Moving in from the Periphery: Exploring the Disciplinary Labyrinth” follows Douglas Eyman’s path from marginalized technorhetorician to tenure track professor. Eyman found support through virtual communities that enabled him to pursue his interests and research in the face of institutional and departmental resistance. Keith Dorwick’s story begins with his studies of “literature informed by religion” and follows his attempts to make his work meaningful to his students, eventuating in student-centered teaching, which in turn led to cyberspace. As he has since moved on from a writing center professional to a tenure track position as a professor of rhetoric and writing, he concludes that loving what one is doing is necessary to continue such explorations. In the final chapter, Dene Grigar shows how computers opened up new passions for literature, research, and writing. Her road like many others led through a strong competence in computers that at first marginalized her from the mainstream community of English teachers, but which then provided new ways to expand her research and writing: an example described is her hypertextual short story.

In Pushing Boundaries, the third part of this collection, the chapters deal with the risks involved in trying to do something beyond traditional practices. While this chapter begins with “Taking Risks: How to Keep the Juices Flowing” by Pamela B. Childers, which describes her professional growth through the practice of consistently reaching higher, the subsequent chapters deal with specific challenges. Jude Edminster recounts his pioneering digital dissertation experience in the face of institutional resistance. The next chapter traces the path of John M. Slatin as he first resisted the technology that would later help him use the computer as he became blind. He chronicles the development of accessibility tools from their limited beginnings till when they became more accessible for a larger number of users after actual users became involved in the design of the new technologies. Concluding this section is “Networking the Nile: Technology and Professional Development in Egypt,” in which Mark Warschauer recounts a large internet based professional development project he worked on, and how he came to see the greater importance of the humanware in conjunction with the software and hardware.

The final part of the collection, Forging Beyond, takes the reader out of the classroom to the library, the freelance world, industry, and the web-art world. James Elmborg tells readers how a dual path to a Ph.D. in English and a degree in library science led him to find new ways to use technology for writing and accessing literature, thus making him a humanist in the library. With “My Freelance Life: Curiosity Versus Professionalization,” Diane Greco describes her dissatisfaction with the limits of academic study that led her to working as a freelance writer, while acknowledging how some of the skills gained from writing a dissertation prepare one for life outside the world of academic ritual. Beth Hewitt argues for the interdependency of the academic and the business worlds based on her work with Smarthinking, Inc. Mark Amerika concludes the book by answering questions frequently asked him by the many audiences for his different types of web art. Thus a book that began in the ‘real’ classroom ends in a virtual art studio.

Here then in sum are stories of language professionals engaged and engaging with technology at different points in their careers or transitioning between them. It shows that the paths these people took actually took them away from the traditional paths many of their colleagues chose and how the writers grew through these experiences. Chapters end with short summaries of lessons learned, so the reader can reflect with the writer on her or his story and perhaps find common ground with some if not all of the writers. The lessons learned often reflect on the need for humility and collaboration, as none of these writers advanced by going it alone. The writing surprises at times, as different writers use different styles, from straightforward autobiography to a postmodernist text shift with the narrator as both third and first person.

From the previous description, the question arises: What does this book have for second language teachers? Several things come to mind. The writers all took the road less taken. They took the road of increasing use of technology in education when their colleagues shied away from it and took the “safe” career paths. Present and future innovators may take heart from how the writers overcame the challenges of isolation, exclusion, and doubt they faced. For many of us, the language teaching profession has gone through challenges similar to those faced by technorhetoricians, in particular ESL teacher- training programs in U.S. universities. Reflecting on these educators’ strategies for success might prove beneficial and reassuring even when yet another innovative proposal is turned down. Lastly, ESL/EFL teachers already engaged in incorporating technology in their classrooms might find inspiration from the stories of these pioneers and trendsetters.

Those seeking a book about applying the latest Web 2.0 applications or techniques for using various technologies in the classroom will need to look elsewhere. Inman and Hewett have compiled a book for those educators who ask “what if?” and try to do something about it. While those interested in technology in the classroom will no doubt find this book appealing, those interested in how innovative educators think and go about innovating will also find a great deal of guidance and encouragement in these pages as well. As Pamela Childers concludes, “The biggest lesson I have learned during my career is to take risks. I have experimented, developed new visions, and failed at some ideas, but grown as a professional from those failures" (p. 130). These words sum up the thrust of this collection of autobiographical essays on technology and innovation most aptly.

John M. Graney
Santa Fe Community College, Florida, U.S.A.
<john.graneysfcc.edu >

© Copyright rests with authors. Please cite TESL-EJ appropriately.

Editor’s Note: The HTML version contains no page numbers. Please use the PDF version of this article for citations.

© 1994–2026 TESL-EJ, ISSN 1072-4303
Copyright of articles rests with the authors.