• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

site logo
The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language
search
  • Home
  • About TESL-EJ
  • Vols. 1-15 (1994-2012)
    • Volume 1
      • Volume 1, Number 1
      • Volume 1, Number 2
      • Volume 1, Number 3
      • Volume 1, Number 4
    • Volume 2
      • Volume 2, Number 1 — March 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 2 — September 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 3 — January 1997
      • Volume 2, Number 4 — June 1997
    • Volume 3
      • Volume 3, Number 1 — November 1997
      • Volume 3, Number 2 — March 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 3 — September 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 4 — January 1999
    • Volume 4
      • Volume 4, Number 1 — July 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 2 — November 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 3 — May 2000
      • Volume 4, Number 4 — December 2000
    • Volume 5
      • Volume 5, Number 1 — April 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 2 — September 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 3 — December 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 4 — March 2002
    • Volume 6
      • Volume 6, Number 1 — June 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 2 — September 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 3 — December 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 4 — March 2003
    • Volume 7
      • Volume 7, Number 1 — June 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 2 — September 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 3 — December 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 4 — March 2004
    • Volume 8
      • Volume 8, Number 1 — June 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 2 — September 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 3 — December 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 4 — March 2005
    • Volume 9
      • Volume 9, Number 1 — June 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 2 — September 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 3 — December 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 4 — March 2006
    • Volume 10
      • Volume 10, Number 1 — June 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 2 — September 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 3 — December 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 4 — March 2007
    • Volume 11
      • Volume 11, Number 1 — June 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 2 — September 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 3 — December 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 4 — March 2008
    • Volume 12
      • Volume 12, Number 1 — June 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 2 — September 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 3 — December 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 4 — March 2009
    • Volume 13
      • Volume 13, Number 1 — June 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 2 — September 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 3 — December 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 4 — March 2010
    • Volume 14
      • Volume 14, Number 1 — June 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 2 – September 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 3 – December 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 4 – March 2011
    • Volume 15
      • Volume 15, Number 1 — June 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 2 — September 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 3 — December 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 4 — March 2012
  • Vols. 16-Current
    • Volume 16
      • Volume 16, Number 1 — June 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 2 — September 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 3 — December 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 4 – March 2013
    • Volume 17
      • Volume 17, Number 1 – May 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 2 – August 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 3 – November 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 4 – February 2014
    • Volume 18
      • Volume 18, Number 1 – May 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 2 – August 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 3 – November 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 4 – February 2015
    • Volume 19
      • Volume 19, Number 1 – May 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 2 – August 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 3 – November 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 4 – February 2016
    • Volume 20
      • Volume 20, Number 1 – May 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 2 – August 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 3 – November 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 4 – February 2017
    • Volume 21
      • Volume 21, Number 1 – May 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 2 – August 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 3 – November 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 4 – February 2018
    • Volume 22
      • Volume 22, Number 1 – May 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 2 – August 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 3 – November 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 4 – February 2019
    • Volume 23
      • Volume 23, Number 1 – May 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 2 – August 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 3 – November 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 4 – February 2020
    • Volume 24
      • Volume 24, Number 1 – May 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 2 – August 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 3 – November 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 4 – February 2021
    • Volume 25
      • Volume 25, Number 1 – May 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 2 – August 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 3 – November 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 4 – February 2022
    • Volume 26
      • Volume 26, Number 1 – May 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 2 – August 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 3 – November 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 4 – February 2023
    • Volume 27
      • Volume 27, Number 1 – May 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 2 – August 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 3 – November 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 4 – February 2024
    • Volume 28
      • Volume 28, Number 1 – May 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 2 – August 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 3 – November 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 4 – February 2025
    • Volume 29
      • Volume 29, Number 1 – May 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 2 – August 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 3 – November 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 4 – February 2026
    • Volume 30
      • Volume 30, Number 1 – May 2026
      • Volume 30, Number 2 – August 2026
  • Books
  • How to Submit
    • Submission Info
    • Ethical Standards for Authors and Reviewers
    • TESL-EJ Style Sheet for Authors
    • TESL-EJ Tips for Authors
    • Book Review Policy
    • Media Review Policy
    • TESL-EJ Special issues
    • APA Style Guide
  • Editorial Board
  • Support

Teaching English from a Global Perspective

March 2007 — Volume 10, Number 4

 


Teaching English from a Global Perspective

Author: Anne Burns, Ed. (2005)  
Publisher: Washington, DC: TESOL
Pages ISBN Price
Pp. viii +207 193118518-2 (paper) £
$24.95 for TESOL members;
$32.95 for non-members

A recent edition to the TESOL Practice Series, this volume addresses the implications of English as a global language for ESOL practitioners. Within a context of increasingly fluid linguistic, geographical and ideological boundaries, language teachers must be aware of and sensitive to the changing nature of language, teaching, learning, and language use. This volume presents examples from a variety of contexts and perspectives about how teachers are doing just that. Each of the eleven case studies is presented in similar format: introduction, description, distinguishing features, and practical ideas, with appendices that could be adapted for a variety of instructional contexts. The result is a collection that is, despite some minor weaknesses, extremely practical and reader friendly.

In Chapter 1, Burns provides an articulate and succinct overview of the themes of the book, skillfully synthesizing relevant literature with the case studies into a framework that addresses six central questions related to the teaching of English as a global language:

  • Part 1: Whose language?
  • Part 2: Which speakers?
  • Part 3: Which language?
  • Part 4: Which standard?
  • Part 5: Which approaches?
  • Part 6: Which texts?

Part 1 explores the poignant issue of English ownership. In Chapter 2, Brown describes the ways in which the MA TESOL program at Portland State University has aligned its curriculum with the university mission of internationalization by adopting a World Englishes (WE) perspective. She asserts that teacher education programs must raise pre-service teachers’ awareness about the changing ownership of English to better prepare them for their future professional contexts. In Chapter 3, Friedrich describes a course for faculty in a Buenos Aires MBA program that was transitioning to English as the primary medium of instruction because of the growing international student body as well as institutional pressure on faculty to publish in English. Both chapters demonstrate how teacher education must view English as the domain not only of native speakers, but also of a variety of multi-competent users.

Part 2 highlights the interrelatedness of language and culture. In Chapter 4, Meier describes a seminar offered in an MA-TESOL program at a US university that promoted awareness among pre-service teachers of culture’s role in communication. Specifically, students reflected on the ways in which their own cultural backgrounds informed their perceptions of others. In Chapter 5, Matsuda investigates the mismatch between language policy and classroom practices in the context of Japanese high schools. The curricular goal of developing cultural and linguistic awareness through foreign language education is translated into the privileging of native English norms. These chapters suggest the importance of intercultural awareness in language education as well as the need to critically evaluate the ways in which curricula define and implement such awareness.

Parts 3 and 4 focus on the struggles inherent in selecting appropriate varieties of English for the classroom. In Chapter 6, Evans describes a cross-cultural pragmatics course in a Sydney private language institute, which aimed to develop oral communicative competence in the workplace. Due to the multilingual backgrounds of the learners, Evans chose to integrate multiple language varieties into the classroom, using speakers within and outside the classroom as models. The choice to focus on the ways in which discourse practices may vary by cultural context helped learners develop greater facility in intercultural communication. In Chapter 7, Tarnopolsky discusses a business English course he taught in Ukraine and the challenges associated with his decision, based on learner needs, to use both British and American varieties. The chapter raises practical questions for those teachers planning to introduce multiple varieties of English in the absence of a distinct variety of English as a lingua franca. In Chapter 8, Brock reports on a survey distributed to pre-service and practicing English teachers in Macao soliciting their views on the importance of English, the government’s role in English language teaching, and which ‘normative model’ of English should be taught in secondary contexts. Responses indicated the need for increased opportunities for teachers’ language development, guidelines on language standards, use of regional English varieties, and proactive teacher participation in advocating language policies. This article provides a useful example of the ways in which teacher attitudes have direct implications for both practice and policy. Together, these chapters underline how important it is to select appropriate English varieties for instruction, varieties based on learner goals and contexts of language use.

Part 5 is disappointingly spare, with only one case study, a study describing the Philippines English Language Teaching (PELT) Project: a teacher education project which aimed to promote communicative language teaching (CLT) in response to a perceived decline in the quality of English use in public schools. However, the absence of a clear rationale to implement CLT begs the question of what is meant by CLT and who, teachers or administrators, deem it appropriate to use across diverse classroom contexts. It would have been helpful to learn more about whose language use was deteriorating and how (e.g., measures of proficiency, test scores, etc.), in order to better understand why CLT was deemed an appropriate response and to what degree such an approach departed from existing practices. Nevertheless, the article highlights the importance of providing ongoing teacher education to successfully implement educational reform.

Part 6 is one of the stronger sections of the book, both for its case study diversity and the innovative ways in which the teacher-writers use learner needs and local contexts to inform pedagogical practices. Chapter 10 describes how a post-graduate course in literacy education underwent a sociocultural shift to respond to the dynamic, multimodal literacy practices ushered in by the forces of globalization. Chapters 11 and 12 each discusses a university course for international students which exploits globalization as course content to promote language, critical thinking, and student engagement. In Chapter 11, Bozzini introduces students at George Washington University (District of Columbia) to the literature of global English in order “to create a common intellectual locus for peoples of the world” (p. 155). Similarly, Cooke, teaching at York University in Ontario, explores the impacts of globalization as a means of developing learner knowledge of argument text structure within current public discourses.

The themes raised in this collection call to mind Hornberger’s (2003) assertion that “[t]he challenge of negotiating across multiple languages, cultures, and identities is a very real one in classrooms all over the world, one not to be lightly dismissed. Yet, on the whole, educational policy and practice continues blithely to disregard the presence of multiple languages, cultures, and identities in today’s classrooms” (p. 330). This volume attempts to address a very real need for the ELT profession to counteract this criticism. Together, the chapters call for a reorientation, away from native norms to more multilingual perspectives and closer attention to local contexts to inform pedagogical approaches. However, Burns acknowledges that while her contributors’, and others’, efforts are a valuable step toward addressing the issues, much more work needs to be done: “Clearly, despite some of the theoretical debates of the past 10-15 years, classroom practitioners are still in a transitional and tentative phase of experimentation in coming to grips with the implications of teaching English as a global language” (p. 15).

To my mind, one of the most noticeable gaps is the voice of the learners themselves. While central to educational research, investigations of teacher education and attitudes tell us little about their relationship to student learning or actual classroom practices. Perhaps this book tells us as much about what needs to happen as it does about how practitioners are currently responding to the complex issues arising from ELT in global and local contexts.

References

Hornberger, N H. (Ed). (2003). Continua of biliteracy: An ecological framework for educational policy, research and practice in multilingual settings. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. Retrieved November 17, 2006, from http://site.ebrary.com/lib/nau/Doc?id=10051991&ppg=360

Erin-Kate Murphy
Northern Arizona University
<erin-kate.murphynau.edu>

© Copyright rests with authors. Please cite TESL-EJ appropriately.

Editor’s Note: The HTML version contains no page numbers. Please use the PDF version of this article for citations.

© 1994–2026 TESL-EJ, ISSN 1072-4303
Copyright of articles rests with the authors.