• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

site logo
The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language
search
  • Home
  • About TESL-EJ
  • Vols. 1-15 (1994-2012)
    • Volume 1
      • Volume 1, Number 1
      • Volume 1, Number 2
      • Volume 1, Number 3
      • Volume 1, Number 4
    • Volume 2
      • Volume 2, Number 1 — March 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 2 — September 1996
      • Volume 2, Number 3 — January 1997
      • Volume 2, Number 4 — June 1997
    • Volume 3
      • Volume 3, Number 1 — November 1997
      • Volume 3, Number 2 — March 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 3 — September 1998
      • Volume 3, Number 4 — January 1999
    • Volume 4
      • Volume 4, Number 1 — July 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 2 — November 1999
      • Volume 4, Number 3 — May 2000
      • Volume 4, Number 4 — December 2000
    • Volume 5
      • Volume 5, Number 1 — April 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 2 — September 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 3 — December 2001
      • Volume 5, Number 4 — March 2002
    • Volume 6
      • Volume 6, Number 1 — June 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 2 — September 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 3 — December 2002
      • Volume 6, Number 4 — March 2003
    • Volume 7
      • Volume 7, Number 1 — June 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 2 — September 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 3 — December 2003
      • Volume 7, Number 4 — March 2004
    • Volume 8
      • Volume 8, Number 1 — June 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 2 — September 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 3 — December 2004
      • Volume 8, Number 4 — March 2005
    • Volume 9
      • Volume 9, Number 1 — June 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 2 — September 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 3 — December 2005
      • Volume 9, Number 4 — March 2006
    • Volume 10
      • Volume 10, Number 1 — June 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 2 — September 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 3 — December 2006
      • Volume 10, Number 4 — March 2007
    • Volume 11
      • Volume 11, Number 1 — June 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 2 — September 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 3 — December 2007
      • Volume 11, Number 4 — March 2008
    • Volume 12
      • Volume 12, Number 1 — June 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 2 — September 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 3 — December 2008
      • Volume 12, Number 4 — March 2009
    • Volume 13
      • Volume 13, Number 1 — June 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 2 — September 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 3 — December 2009
      • Volume 13, Number 4 — March 2010
    • Volume 14
      • Volume 14, Number 1 — June 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 2 – September 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 3 – December 2010
      • Volume 14, Number 4 – March 2011
    • Volume 15
      • Volume 15, Number 1 — June 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 2 — September 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 3 — December 2011
      • Volume 15, Number 4 — March 2012
  • Vols. 16-Current
    • Volume 16
      • Volume 16, Number 1 — June 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 2 — September 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 3 — December 2012
      • Volume 16, Number 4 – March 2013
    • Volume 17
      • Volume 17, Number 1 – May 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 2 – August 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 3 – November 2013
      • Volume 17, Number 4 – February 2014
    • Volume 18
      • Volume 18, Number 1 – May 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 2 – August 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 3 – November 2014
      • Volume 18, Number 4 – February 2015
    • Volume 19
      • Volume 19, Number 1 – May 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 2 – August 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 3 – November 2015
      • Volume 19, Number 4 – February 2016
    • Volume 20
      • Volume 20, Number 1 – May 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 2 – August 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 3 – November 2016
      • Volume 20, Number 4 – February 2017
    • Volume 21
      • Volume 21, Number 1 – May 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 2 – August 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 3 – November 2017
      • Volume 21, Number 4 – February 2018
    • Volume 22
      • Volume 22, Number 1 – May 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 2 – August 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 3 – November 2018
      • Volume 22, Number 4 – February 2019
    • Volume 23
      • Volume 23, Number 1 – May 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 2 – August 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 3 – November 2019
      • Volume 23, Number 4 – February 2020
    • Volume 24
      • Volume 24, Number 1 – May 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 2 – August 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 3 – November 2020
      • Volume 24, Number 4 – February 2021
    • Volume 25
      • Volume 25, Number 1 – May 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 2 – August 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 3 – November 2021
      • Volume 25, Number 4 – February 2022
    • Volume 26
      • Volume 26, Number 1 – May 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 2 – August 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 3 – November 2022
      • Volume 26, Number 4 – February 2023
    • Volume 27
      • Volume 27, Number 1 – May 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 2 – August 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 3 – November 2023
      • Volume 27, Number 4 – February 2024
    • Volume 28
      • Volume 28, Number 1 – May 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 2 – August 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 3 – November 2024
      • Volume 28, Number 4 – February 2025
    • Volume 29
      • Volume 29, Number 1 – May 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 2 – August 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 3 – November 2025
      • Volume 29, Number 4 – February 2026
    • Volume 30
      • Volume 30, Number 1 – May 2026
      • Volume 30, Number 2 – August 2026
  • Books
  • How to Submit
    • Submission Info
    • Ethical Standards for Authors and Reviewers
    • TESL-EJ Style Sheet for Authors
    • TESL-EJ Tips for Authors
    • Book Review Policy
    • Media Review Policy
    • TESL-EJ Special issues
    • APA Style Guide
  • Editorial Board
  • Support

Sociocognitive Perspectives on Language Use and Language Learning

March 2012 – Volume 15, Number 4

Sociocognitive Perspectives on Language Use and Language Learning

Author: Rob Batstone (Ed.) (2010)  
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Pages ISBN Price
252 pages 978-0-19-442477-6 $33.95 USD

Rob Batstone’s Sociocognitive Perspectives on Language Use and Language Learning is an excellent resource for teachers and researchers. The volume argues that a proper treatment of language acquisition requires inclusion of both cognitive and social aspects—and that neither can be divorced from the other if we want to reach a comprehensive understanding of second language development. The purpose of this volume is to present the works of various scholars who aim to find a synthesis between the cognitive and social elements in Second Language Acquisition (SLA) studies in order to account for the complexities of second language learning, use, and teaching.

The book is divided into three thematic sections each of which has four chapters. Part I, consists of chapters that situate sociocognitive perspectives both theoretically and in relation to the existing paradigms in SLA. In Chapter 1, Batstone provides a clear picture of analytic and holistic perspectives to sociocognition by giving specific examples to illustrate the characteristics of and distinctions between the two. In the next three chapters, Atkinson (Ch. 2), Larsen-Freeman (Ch. 3), and Tarone (Ch. 4) delineate their own sociocognitive approaches, which draw on situated cognition, Complexity Theory, and, sociolinguistics, respectively. These authors explain their sociocognitive approaches and some concepts central to their frameworks —such as alignment and soft assembly. What is especially stimulating in these chapters is the authors’ treatment of traditional theoretical constructs in SLA from their sociocognitive perspectives. For example, while Atkinson illustrates how attention cannot be meaningfully accounted for from a merely cognitivist point of view, Larsen-Freeman revisits vocabulary acquisition and interaction from a Complexity Theory perspective. Similarly, Tarone makes a strong case for how social interaction influences input, interaction, and output, proposing a variationist perspective as an alternative to the traditional conceptualization of these three concepts. Overall, these chapters problematize the theoretical constructs that have traditionally been conceived as primarily cognitive in SLA studies, emphasize the dynamism and variation in SLA, and offer compelling theoretical alternatives. However, since these chapters introduce relatively new concepts from other fields, at times, perhaps inevitably, they can be challenging for some readers. Yet, the authors’ arguments are clear and well supported. Interested readers might consider referring to the other publications of these scholars or the works cited for a more detailed explanation of the terms and theories introduced in these chapters. Overall, the chapters in Part I present promising theoretical frameworks for SLA studies that capture both the cognitive and the social aspects of SLA and that allow researchers to investigate the interactions between the two.

While the chapters in Part I focus on the theoretical issues regarding sociocognitive approaches supported by empirical evidence, the chapters in Part II comprise empirical studies that demonstrate how the social and cognitive determinants of language use and learning interact. The first two chapters explore the interpersonal aspects of sociocognition in language development. In Chapter 5, Duff and Kobayashi present a case for the language socialization paradigm based on Kobayashi’s research in a study abroad context in Canada. This research not only provides evidence for the interplay among cognitive, cultural, and social aspects of language development but also shows how audience, task, prior experiences including native language, oral interactions, material tools, and instruction have a direct influence on second language socialization. In Chapter 6, Yates, Nicholas, and de Courcy report the language development of Iraqi refugees in Australia and look at the role age and gender play, using both quantitative and qualitative research methods. In the next two chapters, drawing on Sociocultural Theory, Swain (Ch. 7) and Lantolf (Ch. 8) investigate how sociocognition guides and mediates second language learning on the intrapersonal level through languaging and gesture, respectively.  Resonating with the main theme of the volume, these chapters claim that the cognitive and the social aspects of language learning are inextricably intertwined and language learning is multimodal. One of the strengths of Part II is that these chapters cover a range of contexts (Canada, Australia), second languages (English, French), and populations (international students, immigrants). This section also adds more sociocognitive theoretical frameworks to the ones introduced in Part I, i.e., language socialization and communities of practice paradigms as well as Sociocultural Theory, hence providing readers more sociocognitive alternatives.

Similar to Part II, the chapters in Part III examine the role interaction plays in language development, but focus more on the sociocognitive factors that influence second language classroom. The classroom-based studies in this section primarily deal with attention to form and feedback in language classrooms. The first three chapters examine the interplay between sociocognitive factors and teacher feedback. In Chapter 9, Ellis discusses the cognitive, social, and psychological determinants of corrective feedback in the literature and argues for inclusion of all three for a comprehensive understanding of corrective feedback. According to Ellis, with its focus on dialogic interaction, Sociocultural Theory is the closest framework for such an understanding of the contentious issue of corrective feedback. Utilizing both qualitative and quantitative research methods, Chapter 10 reports Storch and Wigglesworth’s study on direct and indirect feedback. The authors examine the relationship between different forms of feedback and level of engagement as well as if the level of engagement influences the revisions. Similar to Storch and Wigglesworth, Toth (Ch. 11) reports both the quantitative and qualitative results of an empirical study on form-focused classroom interaction but this time on the interaction between the teacher and the students. Based on relevance theory, the author explores the role of discourse cohesion and shared goals on learner engagement in two different Spanish language classes. While the first three chapters of this section deal with teacher feedback the last chapter by Philp and Mackey explores the social and personal factors that influence peer feedback. Overall, these chapters cover different types of feedback—direct, indirect, teacher, peer, written, and oral. While Ellis provides guidelines for teachers regarding feedback, Storch and Wigglesworth explore the uptake of written teacher feedback. As Toth investigates successful and not-so-successful feedback strategies in teacher led discourse, Philp and Mackey look into the social dynamics of peer feedback. Therefore, I believe teachers and researchers that are interested in feedback and action research will especially find the chapters in Part III very useful.

If the recent publications in the last decade on the sociocognitive perspectives in SLA are taken as an indication, there is a growing interest in frameworks that advocate a more balanced treatment of cognitive and social determinants of SLA—e.g., Atkinson (2011), Kramsch (2002), Larsen-Freeman and Cameron (2008), and van Lier (2004). This edited volume by Batstone contributes to that literature by bringing several sociocognitive approaches and empirical studies together. This book will especially be stimulating for readers interested in the ways social and cognitive can be brought together in teaching and research. Another advantage of this book is that it discusses both theoretical and empirical issues as well as pedagogical concerns. Therefore, I believe a wide range of readers, graduate students, researchers, and teachers alike, will find this book appealing and helpful.

References

Atkinson, D. (Ed.). (2011). Alternative approaches to second language acquisition. London: Routledge.

Kramsch, C. (Ed.) (2002). Language acquisition and language socialization: Ecological perspectives. London: Continuum.

Larsen-Freeman, D., & Cameron, L. (2008). Complex systems and applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

van Lier, L. (2004). The ecology and semiotics of language learning: A sociocultural perspective. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic.

Reviewed by
Beril T. Arik
Purdue University
<btezelleatmarkpurdue.edu>

© Copyright rests with authors. Please cite TESL-EJ appropriately.Editor’s Note: The HTML version contains no page numbers. Please use the PDF version of this article for citations.

© 1994–2026 TESL-EJ, ISSN 1072-4303
Copyright of articles rests with the authors.